main differences ???
Thanx
Mozilla X Firebir 0.6
- shadytrees
- Moderator
- Posts: 11743
- Joined: November 30th, 2002, 6:41 am
Mozilla:
- has email client, IRC, composer, etc.
- some consider it bloated
- some consider it slow
- less themes to choose from
Firebird:
- faster
- lightweight
- browser-only
- lots of cool themes
- soon to *be* Mozilla
- based on a different XUL toolkit
- lots of cool extensions
- I use it so it has to be cool
I can foresee that this is going to be a really long thread. If you want more information on Firebird:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firebird/why/
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firebird/
http://texturizer.net/firebird/
- has email client, IRC, composer, etc.
- some consider it bloated
- some consider it slow
- less themes to choose from
Firebird:
- faster
- lightweight
- browser-only
- lots of cool themes
- soon to *be* Mozilla
- based on a different XUL toolkit
- lots of cool extensions
- I use it so it has to be cool
I can foresee that this is going to be a really long thread. If you want more information on Firebird:
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firebird/why/
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/firebird/
http://texturizer.net/firebird/
-
- Posts: 634
- Joined: November 5th, 2002, 5:35 am
- Location: The Netherlands, when not travelling
Firebird:
- acts just like IE in a lot of ways
- some consider it fast
- some consider it lightweight
- has customizable toolbars
Mozilla:
- more mature
- everything just works
- comes with a mail program with bayesian spam filtering (>99% accuracy after initial training)
- integrated google search in toolbar
- preferences you _need_ actually have some interface
- better security settings, dom inspector, tabgroups appending, better default theme, helper applications can be changed, ...
- doesn't constrict you or force you to do things in exactly the same way its developers do them
- lots of cool extensions, though you won't need them, as the functionality is already there
- I use it so it has to be cool
- acts just like IE in a lot of ways
- some consider it fast
- some consider it lightweight
- has customizable toolbars
Mozilla:
- more mature
- everything just works
- comes with a mail program with bayesian spam filtering (>99% accuracy after initial training)
- integrated google search in toolbar
- preferences you _need_ actually have some interface
- better security settings, dom inspector, tabgroups appending, better default theme, helper applications can be changed, ...
- doesn't constrict you or force you to do things in exactly the same way its developers do them
- lots of cool extensions, though you won't need them, as the functionality is already there
- I use it so it has to be cool
- shadytrees
- Moderator
- Posts: 11743
- Joined: November 30th, 2002, 6:41 am
integrated google search in toolbar
Firebird has that too. Right-click toolbar->Customize. I think it also comes as the default setup too.
Oh, more things (for Firebird):
- customizable toolbars to suit yourself
- cooler Preferences menu with things that an average user needs accessible in a nice interface
- most things you want in Mozilla can be easily added to Firebird in the form of extensions (TBE also works in Firebird, Style Sheet selector, etc; more complete listing: http://extensionroom.mozdev.org)
- you can actually *have* the Mozilla theme on Firebird (download them from http://texturizer.net/firebird/themes.html)
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: June 5th, 2003, 2:14 pm
main difference: versions!
Firebird:
- browser only -> inherently lighter
- version 0.6, this is pre-alpha; however very very stable
- feastures not available in Mozilla Suite :
- customizable toolbars
- some bookmarks management available by right clicking on the menus and toolbar
Mozilla
- suite of internet applications -> inherently a little fat (I still don't get the "Mozilla is fat" sentence)
- version 1.4; so very very stable
Since this is version 0.6 I don't find it fair to compare it to Mozilla or any other browser. Things are to come and go, and there's a long way to go 'till Mozilla Browser 1.0
- browser only -> inherently lighter
- version 0.6, this is pre-alpha; however very very stable
- feastures not available in Mozilla Suite :
- customizable toolbars
- some bookmarks management available by right clicking on the menus and toolbar
Mozilla
- suite of internet applications -> inherently a little fat (I still don't get the "Mozilla is fat" sentence)
- version 1.4; so very very stable
Since this is version 0.6 I don't find it fair to compare it to Mozilla or any other browser. Things are to come and go, and there's a long way to go 'till Mozilla Browser 1.0
-
- Guest