Azure Progress
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: March 24th, 2011, 10:38 am
Re: Azure Progress
sry for my bad english.
My real user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv: current nightly) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/current nightly
My real user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv: current nightly) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/current nightly
- faulty_fox
- Posts: 421
- Joined: April 20th, 2010, 10:25 am
Re: Azure Progress
What is it expected to improve? If i understand it correctly this is used to cache the most used CSS gradients, so will this improve the rendering speed of the content and UI as well?
- _Alexander
- Posts: 1197
- Joined: April 1st, 2010, 2:24 pm
- Location: Your augmented reality
Re: Azure Progress
Apparently Firefox still uses gradients in their UI. /s
Still has years to go.
Still has years to go.
http://magneticpudding.com/ <- My Blog
i5 3570k @ 4.5 Ghz / NV 660 / 32GB DDR3 / 1080p LCD / SSD (120 + 180) / W8 ||| Atom N270 / NV ION / 3GB DDR3 / SSD / 1366x768 / W8
i5 3570k @ 4.5 Ghz / NV 660 / 32GB DDR3 / 1080p LCD / SSD (120 + 180) / W8 ||| Atom N270 / NV ION / 3GB DDR3 / SSD / 1366x768 / W8
- Omega X
- Posts: 8225
- Joined: October 18th, 2007, 2:38 pm
- Location: A Parallel Dimension...
Re: Azure Progress
Pr0phet wrote:What is it expected to improve? If i understand it correctly this is used to cache the most used CSS gradients, so will this improve the rendering speed of the content and UI as well?
It means that the browser doesn't have to re-render a gradient when its used again. Websites that use css gradients should see improved rendering and performance when scrolling.
- faulty_fox
- Posts: 421
- Joined: April 20th, 2010, 10:25 am
Re: Azure Progress
Thanks for the explanation, there has also been some activity on DLBI lately. I really hope that they'll manage to fix it in time for FF18 since a lot of the performance / snappy bugs should be fixed by it.
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: March 14th, 2010, 3:44 am
-
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: July 18th, 2003, 10:09 pm
Re: Azure Progress
dbcooper.dk wrote:Update on layers refactoring/OMTC:
http://featherweightmusings.blogspot.co ... oring.html
It looks like OMTC went through a few reboot and it is alot further way then we initially thought....
- iceccold
- Posts: 661
- Joined: February 24th, 2010, 10:53 am
- Location: Subotica, Serbia
- Contact:
Re: Azure Progress
How's Firefox perfoming for you on this Canvas performance test?
Compare it with IE9 and Chrome.
Compare it with IE9 and Chrome.
"We cannot have homeland security unless we understand that the whole planet is our homeland "
- Omega X
- Posts: 8225
- Joined: October 18th, 2007, 2:38 pm
- Location: A Parallel Dimension...
Re: Azure Progress
Pr0phet wrote:Thanks for the explanation, there has also been some activity on DLBI lately. I really hope that they'll manage to fix it in time for FF18 since a lot of the performance / snappy bugs should be fixed by it.
Yeah, about half of those patches have landed with the rest on the way. The only reason why it hasn't landed fully yet is because of a 5% painting regression in some cases. I think they're trying to find a way to mitigate that until OMTC lands.
- ferongr
- Posts: 537
- Joined: February 16th, 2011, 9:51 am
Re: Azure Progress
iceccold wrote:How's Firefox perfoming for you on this Canvas performance test?
Compare it with IE9 and Chrome.
IE9 doesn't work, complains that a script is sent with the wrong mime-type. Chromium Canary and Nightly are identical in performance, locked at 60 FPS. I forked it and enlarged the canvas, and also increased the number of particles to 5000.
http://jsdo.it/ferongr/aCF7/fullscreen
Over here Nightly stays at roughly 30FPS, while Chromium Canary is at 18-20FPS.
What Falken giveth, the tōge taketh away.
-
- Posts: 302
- Joined: October 2nd, 2010, 8:56 am
Re: Azure Progress
iceccold wrote:How's Firefox perfoming for you on this Canvas performance test?
Compare it with IE9 and Chrome.
Firefox has pauses on that test even though IGC is enabled.
- iceccold
- Posts: 661
- Joined: February 24th, 2010, 10:53 am
- Location: Subotica, Serbia
- Contact:
Re: Azure Progress
muhahaa wrote:iceccold wrote:How's Firefox perfoming for you on this Canvas performance test?
Compare it with IE9 and Chrome.
Firefox has pauses on that test even though IGC is enabled.
Yeah, I've noticed that. Should we file a bug, or should we wait for GGC?
Thanks ferongr.
"We cannot have homeland security unless we understand that the whole planet is our homeland "
-
- Posts: 371
- Joined: September 17th, 2010, 7:55 am
Re: Azure Progress
http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/articl ... -released/
Nvidia has released new WHQL drivers, all Nvidia users should update to the latest drivers.
Nvidia has released new WHQL drivers, all Nvidia users should update to the latest drivers.
- _Alexander
- Posts: 1197
- Joined: April 1st, 2010, 2:24 pm
- Location: Your augmented reality
Re: Azure Progress
Good News Everyone, Azure is bad,
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=790966
Bug 790966 - Tab animations slower with gfx.content.azure.enabled=true
Enabling Azure for content slows down tab animations.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=790966
Bug 790966 - Tab animations slower with gfx.content.azure.enabled=true
Enabling Azure for content slows down tab animations.
http://magneticpudding.com/ <- My Blog
i5 3570k @ 4.5 Ghz / NV 660 / 32GB DDR3 / 1080p LCD / SSD (120 + 180) / W8 ||| Atom N270 / NV ION / 3GB DDR3 / SSD / 1366x768 / W8
i5 3570k @ 4.5 Ghz / NV 660 / 32GB DDR3 / 1080p LCD / SSD (120 + 180) / W8 ||| Atom N270 / NV ION / 3GB DDR3 / SSD / 1366x768 / W8
- kilara1988
- Posts: 374
- Joined: July 1st, 2011, 2:57 am
Re: Azure Progress
Why would it be a good news that Azure is bad?