Javascript Performance Thread
- bogas04
- Posts: 977
- Joined: May 18th, 2010, 1:14 am
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
Dunno if regression jerk or what , but we got nice win on Octane and v8 (which look exactly same to me though , for FF and Chrome)
http://arewefastyet.com/?a=b&view=regress
Maybe coz of landing of many IonMonkey patches lately? : viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2645951
http://arewefastyet.com/?a=b&view=regress
Maybe coz of landing of many IonMonkey patches lately? : viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2645951
-
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: July 18th, 2003, 10:09 pm
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
bogas04 wrote:Dunno if regression jerk or what , but we got nice win on Octane and v8 (which look exactly same to me though , for FF and Chrome)
http://arewefastyet.com/?a=b&view=regress
Maybe coz of landing of many IonMonkey patches lately? : viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2645951
Properly. but any other major Win in Octane and V8 would properly requires GGC.
- Zlip792
- Posts: 1340
- Joined: May 7th, 2011, 1:47 pm
- Location: Pakistan
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
bogas, it might be due to Brian Hackett patch to improve v8 (Raytrace) benchmark upto 23%.
Bug link: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=832329
Bug link: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=832329
- KilliK
- Posts: 612
- Joined: June 18th, 2004, 7:11 am
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
when is GGC going to be completed? is there any ETA given by the devs?
-
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: July 18th, 2003, 10:09 pm
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
Zlip792 wrote:bogas, it might be due to Brian Hackett patch to improve v8 (Raytrace) benchmark upto 23%.
Bug link: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=832329
God Damn it Brain should be working on SuperSnappy......
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.c ... upersnappy
when is GGC going to be completed? is there any ETA given by the devs?
Quite Possibly not in 2013 I am afraid.....
- KilliK
- Posts: 612
- Joined: June 18th, 2004, 7:11 am
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
uh, that soon..
- Zlip792
- Posts: 1340
- Joined: May 7th, 2011, 1:47 pm
- Location: Pakistan
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
First they are adding Exact Rooting mechanism then they will add Generational GC on it and then remove its overhead. They are progressing good so lets see.
- Omega X
- Posts: 8225
- Joined: October 18th, 2007, 2:38 pm
- Location: A Parallel Dimension...
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
I think GGC will come in 2013. IMO, These patches landing means that they're relatively close.
-
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: July 18th, 2003, 10:09 pm
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
Omega X wrote:I think GGC will come in 2013. IMO, These patches landing means that they're relatively close.
Exact Rooting still have lots of Bugs opened and progress has been slow. We need that before moving on to GGC....
- Omega X
- Posts: 8225
- Joined: October 18th, 2007, 2:38 pm
- Location: A Parallel Dimension...
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
And I still think that GGC will happen this year.
-
- Posts: 169
- Joined: July 23rd, 2004, 11:48 am
- Location: London, UK
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
Something broken in the 64bit charts, as they haven't been updated for about a week.
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: April 1st, 2011, 10:03 am
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
Same for ARM, but that's not overly unusual for that machine.
-
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: July 18th, 2003, 10:09 pm
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
Finally some news from the JS Team
http://javascript-reverse.tumblr.com/po ... eam-update
GGC Progress Report ( Which we already knew ) and the new Baseline JIT......
http://javascript-reverse.tumblr.com/po ... eam-update
GGC Progress Report ( Which we already knew ) and the new Baseline JIT......
- Omega X
- Posts: 8225
- Joined: October 18th, 2007, 2:38 pm
- Location: A Parallel Dimension...
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
Nice to see that Ion allowed Firefox to nearly catch up to Chrome in such a short amount of time.
-
- Posts: 1033
- Joined: July 18th, 2003, 10:09 pm
Re: Javascript Performance Thread
The best part about the new Baseline would be to get rid of ( JM + TI ). Hopefully some Codesize and memory reduction would be a side effect as well.
Along with GGC the JS in Firefox has finally catched up in Chrome.
Along with GGC the JS in Firefox has finally catched up in Chrome.