0.6.1 candidate builds available

michaell522 · Post by **michaell522** » July 28th, 2003, 10:38 am

XF wrote:
voyager wrote:Would be nice to see fix for Bug 195598 (Repaint problem) in Firebird 0.6.1.

I'd like to see this fix, too... trying the 1.5a builds I've started to see it again...

hmm... it would. However, that problem existed in 0.6 anyway. I think it's time to just release 0.6.1 - the whole point of 0.6.1 is that it was a quick interim release to fix up 0.6 instead of waiting for 0.7.

If we wait much longer, 0.6.1 will be coming out at the same time as 0.7. Would be better to just get 0.6.1 out of the way and concentrate on moving things forward on the trunk for 0.7

xfranky · Post by **xfranky** » July 28th, 2003, 10:47 am

Well, for me that's not a problem. After 0.6.1 is released I'll go back to trunk builds where the repaint bug is fixed...

Nitrile · Post by **Nitrile** » July 28th, 2003, 10:56 am

i recommend the latest build.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030728 Mozilla Firebird/0.6.1

DamianMoran · Post by **DamianMoran** » July 28th, 2003, 11:07 am

Nitrile wrote:i recommend the latest build.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030728 Mozilla Firebird/0.6.1

The majority have had problems with this build as have I... it is IMO unstable in many areas.

EDIT: Yes, I see now this is milestone, not trunk.

logan · Post by **logan** » July 28th, 2003, 11:16 am

So far so good.

A small patch (gtk1, gtk2) has been posted for the dhtml menu bug that affects linux, how about workin this into 0.6.1? Sure would be nice.

http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102578

There's also my patch to add an id to the menuseparator so 'Open in Tabs' and the separator can both be hidden with userChrome.css, but that's hardly a big problem like the dhtml menu bit.

http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213787

jrobbio · Post by **jrobbio** » July 28th, 2003, 4:15 pm

I'm not sure if its something I've done or an extension I've installed, but I cannot seem to save image files with the latest 0.61 candidate. Can anyone else confirm this?

Rob

Ralf Hutter · Post by **Ralf Hutter** » July 28th, 2003, 7:04 pm

jrobbio wrote:I'm not sure if its something I've done or an extension I've installed, but I cannot seem to save image files with the latest 0.61 candidate. Can anyone else confirm this?

Rob

Works fine for me.

Build: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030727 Mozilla Firebird/0.6.1.

jrobbio · Post by **jrobbio** » July 28th, 2003, 7:45 pm

Ralf Hutter wrote:
jrobbio wrote:I'm not sure if its something I've done or an extension I've installed, but I cannot seem to save image files with the latest 0.61 candidate. Can anyone else confirm this?

Rob

Works fine for me.

Build: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030727 Mozilla Firebird/0.6.1.

Must have been a temporary glitch, its working for me now. Cheers for checking.

daihard · Post by **daihard** » July 28th, 2003, 10:29 pm

That's what about:buildconfig shows, but then why is it running smoothly on my Red Hat 7.3 box? The official build of Thunderbird is built with GCC 3.2, and it refused to run on the same box.

codfather · Post by **codfather** » July 28th, 2003, 11:20 pm

When you load FB from the command line in RH 9.0 - kernel 2.4.20-19.9 you get the following error message.

LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library /home/nhaddock/MozillaFirebird/plugins/java2/plugin/i386/ns600/libjavaplugin_oji.so [/home/nhaddock/MozillaFirebird/plugins/java2/plugin/i386/ns600/libjavaplugin_oji.so: undefined symbol: __vt_17nsGetServiceByCID]

This RH version uses GCC 3.2.2-5.

I have seen this before on other releases, but then another nightly normally fixes it.

I have removed .mozilla and Mozillafirebird completely and re-installed.

I have re-downloaded the java plugin.

Anyone got any thoughts?

Nick

Old Persist · Post by **Old Persist** » July 29th, 2003, 9:30 am

These release candidates all launch with the mozilla.org start page. Wouldn’t it be better if they started with the texturizer help page like the latest nightlies?

veneta · Post by **veneta** » July 30th, 2003, 2:39 am

Sorry to ask this question, I am sure someone must have posted it before, but I couldn't find it on the search engine. Can someone tell me when I can expect a solaris buidl? I am really eager to start playing with FireBird.... or where can I get the source and attempt to build it myself. Tried the firebird download page but saw no source links. thanks!

xfranky · Post by **xfranky** » July 30th, 2003, 3:06 am

veneta wrote:Sorry to ask this question, I am sure someone must have posted it before, but I couldn't find it on the search engine. Can someone tell me when I can expect a solaris buidl? I am really eager to start playing with FireBird.... or where can I get the source and attempt to build it myself. Tried the firebird download page but saw no source links. thanks!

http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=17454

0.6.1 candidate builds available

RC compiled with GCC 3.2?

Problem with java on Linux with 0.6.1

Home Page?

FireBird for Solaris?

Re: FireBird for Solaris?