Discussion about official Mozilla Thunderbird builds
rsx11m
Moderator
Posts: 14430Joined: May 3rd, 2007, 7:40 amLocation: US
Posted June 7th, 2016, 4:48 pm
-Arch- wrote:what Build of TB will be the Next Beta? 47 or 48 ?
THUNDERBIRD_47_0b1_BUILD1 was tagged 2016-06-04 and candidate builds are up, thus I'd assume those will be released next. also, what TB version will be the next ESR? 51 or 52 ?
45 + 7 = 52.
Mouse5
Posts: 1330Joined: April 11th, 2014, 7:34 pmLocation: Sydney Australia
Posted June 7th, 2016, 5:16 pm
...............
Last edited by Mouse5 on April 22nd, 2017, 3:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
rsx11m
Moderator
Posts: 14430Joined: May 3rd, 2007, 7:40 amLocation: US
Posted June 15th, 2016, 9:01 pm
Anybody knows what's going on with http://mxr.mozilla.org/ site for browsing the sources? It has been showing the "Repairs in Progress" page for more than a day now...
WaltS48

Posts: 4741Joined: May 7th, 2010, 9:38 amLocation: Pennsylvania, USA
Posted June 16th, 2016, 8:28 am
I thought they wanted us to use https://dxr.mozilla.org/ and mxr was going to be decommissioned? Forget where I saw that, and I could be wrong.
Linux Desktop - AMD Athlon(tm) II X3 455 3.3GHz | 8.0GB RAM | GeForce GT 630 Windows Notebook - AMD A8 7410 2.2GHz | 6.0GB RAM | AMD Radeon R5
rsx11m
Moderator
Posts: 14430Joined: May 3rd, 2007, 7:40 amLocation: US
Posted June 16th, 2016, 10:17 am
That would be a pitty, I like MXR better (or just got used to it). Clicking on a function name in DXR doesn't look up that function for me with NoScript enabled, despite mozilla.org being whitelisted. Edit: Hmm, ok. Works in Firefox but not SeaMonkey, bummer.
rsx11m
Moderator
Posts: 14430Joined: May 3rd, 2007, 7:40 amLocation: US
Posted June 19th, 2016, 12:21 pm
There has been a change in the update URL, checked in for trunk thus far only, adding a system-capabilities component (see bug 1274721 for details). Thus, nightly updates may or may not work tomorrow (especially if your CPU doesn't have SSE2 support).
C@rb0n
Posts: 1428Joined: February 19th, 2005, 11:22 am
Posted June 29th, 2016, 10:55 pm
Does anyone know what's happening with Win64 builds? There hasn't been a build since May 8.
Thanks
wsmwk
Posts: 2663Joined: December 7th, 2004, 6:52 am
Posted July 1st, 2016, 10:11 am
C@rb0n wrote:Does anyone know what's happening with Win64 builds? There hasn't been a build since May 8.
Thanks
you need >4gb addressible space?
C@rb0n
Posts: 1428Joined: February 19th, 2005, 11:22 am
Posted July 1st, 2016, 10:18 am
wsm wrote:you need >4gb addressible space?
Gotta store the spam somewhere. But seriously. Not really. Just found that the 64-bit version performed better overall.
C@rb0n
Posts: 1428Joined: February 19th, 2005, 11:22 am
Posted July 1st, 2016, 10:30 am
Thanks. I'll monitor that bug.
Mouse5
Posts: 1330Joined: April 11th, 2014, 7:34 pmLocation: Sydney Australia
Posted July 9th, 2016, 5:52 pm
...........
Last edited by Mouse5 on April 22nd, 2017, 3:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
rsx11m
Moderator
Posts: 14430Joined: May 3rd, 2007, 7:40 amLocation: US
Posted July 10th, 2016, 5:48 pm
Not likely, except for some fringe cases (nothing coming into my mind). On Linux, having 64-bit builds makes sense given that not everybody installs the 32-bit runtime libraries. On Windows, there is a dedicated WOW64 layer for 32-bit applications, which may introduce for those compared to native 64-bit builds, but I don't know if it has a quantifiable impact.
Xeno22
Posts: 6Joined: January 3rd, 2016, 11:53 pm
Posted July 10th, 2016, 11:05 pm
Anybody got experience with Mac OS Sierra and thunderbird daily? I try to start it, but it hangs with 100% CPU usage.
Xeno22
Posts: 6Joined: January 3rd, 2016, 11:53 pm
Posted July 14th, 2016, 4:33 am
To answer my question: applied the malloc fix - works ok.
Return to Thunderbird Builds
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
|