We're back!
-
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: April 11th, 2014, 7:34 pm
- Location: Sydney Australia
Re: We're back!
just wondered, is there any point in updating this forum to 3.2.x ?
- Grumpus
- Posts: 13246
- Joined: October 19th, 2007, 4:23 am
- Location: ... Da' Swamp
Re: We're back!
@-Arch- for the old ones who haven't become androids.
Doesn't matter what you say, it's wrong for a toaster to walk around the house and talk to you
-
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: April 11th, 2014, 7:34 pm
- Location: Sydney Australia
Re: We're back!
doesnt make any sense for Kerz to waste his time if people like Alice etc are going to be using Chrome. there's gonna be less activity on this forum, unless you split it up into 2, Mozilla stuff as well as Chrome stuffGrumpus wrote:@-Arch- for the old ones who haven't become androids.
- Grumpus
- Posts: 13246
- Joined: October 19th, 2007, 4:23 am
- Location: ... Da' Swamp
Re: We're back!
@-Arch- Alice is one person and at last look Firefox and Chrome are running neck and neck.
With changes coming it might be good to look at the changes instead of the "Chicken Little" factors.
Not supporting anything, just watching and waiting in the here and now and avoiding the screaming change nitwits.
IMO Chrome isn't Mozilla and to change the 'zine to provide for a non-Mozilla package would go against singularity.
Any Chrome dialogue should always go in the tech forum anyway.
With changes coming it might be good to look at the changes instead of the "Chicken Little" factors.
Not supporting anything, just watching and waiting in the here and now and avoiding the screaming change nitwits.
IMO Chrome isn't Mozilla and to change the 'zine to provide for a non-Mozilla package would go against singularity.
Any Chrome dialogue should always go in the tech forum anyway.
Doesn't matter what you say, it's wrong for a toaster to walk around the house and talk to you
-
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: April 11th, 2014, 7:34 pm
- Location: Sydney Australia
Re: We're back!
but this forum isnt the official Mozilla Help Product forum, so i dont think it would go " against " anything .Grumpus wrote:@-Arch- Alice is one person and at last look Firefox and Chrome are running neck and neck.
With changes coming it might be good to look at the changes instead of the "Chicken Little" factors.
Not supporting anything, just watching and waiting in the here and now and avoiding the screaming change nitwits.
IMO Chrome isn't Mozilla and to change the 'zine to provide for a non-Mozilla package would go against singularity.
Any Chrome dialogue should always go in the tech forum anyway.
- DanRaisch
- Moderator
- Posts: 127249
- Joined: September 23rd, 2004, 8:57 pm
- Location: Somewhere on the right coast
Re: We're back!
It would for folks who have chosen Mozilla products over Outlook, Chrome, and other software choices in the same categories. Google has more than enough money to fund paid support pages.
-
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: April 11th, 2014, 7:34 pm
- Location: Sydney Australia
Re: We're back!
kerzkerz wrote:Many thanks to OSU for help. We had a snafu with the main database, and it took a while to shake out all the issues. Thanks for your patience!
im unsure if it is already but are you intending to make this forum / domain name HTTPS an not HTTP ? when you upgrade the forum
-
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: April 11th, 2014, 7:34 pm
- Location: Sydney Australia
Re: We're back!
any timeframe of when the forum update may be done? ( now that phpbb 3.2 is out )kerz wrote:That's in the cards, and was part of why this broke. Lots to do, little time.