SM Nightly Build January 2017
-
- Posts: 695
- Joined: January 9th, 2017, 10:10 am
SM Nightly Build January 2017
What, and where, are the latest decent stable "Seamonkey" "Nightly Builds"?
Right now, I'm using:
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46
Build identifier: 20161213183751
Just wondering if there is anything newer which might use a bit less memory.
Thanks.
Right now, I'm using:
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46
Build identifier: 20161213183751
Just wondering if there is anything newer which might use a bit less memory.
Thanks.
-
- Posts: 1504
- Joined: October 1st, 2014, 3:25 pm
Re: SM Nightly Build January 2017
There is no such thing. Nightly builds are pre-release, bleeding-edge code. They only exist for testing/bug-hunting purposes.DN123ABC wrote:What, and where, are the latest decent stable "Seamonkey" "Nightly Builds"?
Nightly builds cannot be expected to be decent or stable.
How much memory is it using? How many webpages do you have open at the time?DN123ABC wrote:Just wondering if there is anything newer which might use a bit less memory.
- WaltS48
- Posts: 5141
- Joined: May 7th, 2010, 9:38 am
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Re: SM Nightly Build January 2017
Unstable and experimental Nightly builds are at Directory Listing: /pub/seamonkey/nightly/latest-comm-central-trunk/.
Note that the last Windows build is from 14-Jan-2017.
Note that the last Windows build is from 14-Jan-2017.
Linux Desktop - AMD Athlon(tm) II X3 455 3.3GHz | 8.0GB RAM | GeForce GT 630
Windows Notebook - AMD A8 7410 2.2GHz | 6.0GB RAM | AMD Radeon R5
Windows Notebook - AMD A8 7410 2.2GHz | 6.0GB RAM | AMD Radeon R5
-
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: December 15th, 2015, 1:20 pm
Re: SM Nightly Build January 2017
Don't touch 2.50a1 yet unless you are willing to help out documenting and reporting bugs.
If you want a test drive pick the latest 2.49a2 which as of now is:
https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonk ... mm-aurora/
Has a known drag and drop bug but otherwise the SeaMonkey side should be quite stable. The mozilla backend still changes almost daily and mail might have some problmes of its own so if you run into an odd bug or two don't be alarmed. For daily browsing it should be fine.
It has been decided to do a 2.49ESR so this release will be with us for a long time and depending how the Firefox self destruction saga with xul and classic extensions removal continues might be even supported longer than one ESR cycle.
In my opinion it uses less memory and is faster than 2.46 but don't expect wonders. Less and faster are relative terms...
Relevant bugs in it are tracked in:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313304
If you try it back up your profile. The internal databases will be upgraded to a new version.
FRG
If you want a test drive pick the latest 2.49a2 which as of now is:
https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/seamonk ... mm-aurora/
Has a known drag and drop bug but otherwise the SeaMonkey side should be quite stable. The mozilla backend still changes almost daily and mail might have some problmes of its own so if you run into an odd bug or two don't be alarmed. For daily browsing it should be fine.
It has been decided to do a 2.49ESR so this release will be with us for a long time and depending how the Firefox self destruction saga with xul and classic extensions removal continues might be even supported longer than one ESR cycle.
In my opinion it uses less memory and is faster than 2.46 but don't expect wonders. Less and faster are relative terms...
Relevant bugs in it are tracked in:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1313304
If you try it back up your profile. The internal databases will be upgraded to a new version.
FRG
-
- Posts: 695
- Joined: January 9th, 2017, 10:10 am
Re: SM Nightly Build January 2017
I just updated from Seamonkey 2.40 to 2.46, using the Help menu updater.
Is 2.49 fairly good? I used to be more up to date, but got burned too much, so wait it out a bit more.
Thanks.
Is 2.49 fairly good? I used to be more up to date, but got burned too much, so wait it out a bit more.
Thanks.
-
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: December 15th, 2015, 1:20 pm
Re: SM Nightly Build January 2017
2.49 is now beta. There is still a drag and drop bug in it but you will likely never notice this one unless you regularly drop urls onto the browser window. Mail and news might have some regressions due to internal changes in Thunderbird which need to be evaluated and eventually be backported to SeaMonkey but for everyday use its ok. If you are a power user for mail/news stay away for now. I use it daily for occasional mails with imap and newsgroups and its ok for me. If you try it backup you profile or you will not be able to go back easily.
Personally i think it will become a good release. Subjective speed increase and seems to use about 30 to 50 MB memory less out of the box. YMMV
FRG
Personally i think it will become a good release. Subjective speed increase and seems to use about 30 to 50 MB memory less out of the box. YMMV
FRG
-
- Posts: 695
- Joined: January 9th, 2017, 10:10 am
Re: SM Nightly Build January 2017
Faster and less memory? What's not to like? It seems Firefox is going the other direction.
-
- Posts: 270
- Joined: January 20th, 2015, 12:29 pm
Re: SM Nightly Build January 2017
Good timing - just in time for the ESRfrg wrote:Personally i think it will become a good release. Subjective speed increase and seems to use about 30 to 50 MB memory less out of the box. YMMV
-
- Posts: 784
- Joined: June 24th, 2009, 1:07 pm
Re: SM Nightly Build January 2017
well where are the actual 2.49 betas, FRG? I can't find them anywhere.frg wrote:2.49 is now beta.
FRG
-
- Posts: 1504
- Joined: October 1st, 2014, 3:25 pm
Re: SM Nightly Build January 2017
@4td8s He's referring to the source code. I don't think there are any official builds yet.
If you're willing to use untested builds and report bugs, watch this space - https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/t ... eta-win32/
If you're willing to use untested builds and report bugs, watch this space - https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/t ... eta-win32/
-
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: December 15th, 2015, 1:20 pm
Re: SM Nightly Build January 2017
Official betas are still at least 2 to 3 weeks away. 2.48 will come first.
You can try the latest 2.49a2 aurora which is still very close to the beta:
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/n ... mm-aurora/
Adrian has not yet updated his builds but watch out here too:
https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~aka ... y/nightly/
You can try the latest 2.49a2 aurora which is still very close to the beta:
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/n ... mm-aurora/
Adrian has not yet updated his builds but watch out here too:
https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~aka ... y/nightly/
-
- Posts: 1504
- Joined: October 1st, 2014, 3:25 pm
Re: SM Nightly Build January 2017
I do regularly drop urls onto the browser window. What bug # is this?frg wrote:There is still a drag and drop bug in it but you will likely never notice this one unless you regularly drop urls onto the browser window.
-
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: December 15th, 2015, 1:20 pm
Re: SM Nightly Build January 2017
> I do regularly drop urls onto the browser window. What bug # is this?
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1319212
For 2.49+ If you build it yourself try the fix and let me know how it works.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1319212
For 2.49+ If you build it yourself try the fix and let me know how it works.
-
- Posts: 695
- Joined: January 9th, 2017, 10:10 am
Re: SM Nightly Build January 2017
2 to 3 weeks have passed. Where is this "beta"? Would it be 2.48 beta, 2.49 beta, or something else?frg wrote:Official betas are still at least 2 to 3 weeks away. 2.48 will come first.
You can try the latest 2.49a2 aurora which is still very close to the beta:
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/seamonkey/n ... mm-aurora/
Adrian has not yet updated his builds but watch out here too:
https://l10n.mozilla-community.org/~aka ... y/nightly/
I'm having a hard time finding the windows installer, and there were links above starting with both ftp.xxxxxxxxxxx or archive.xxxxxxxxxx which look similar, but the structure is not intuitive.
-
- Posts: 307
- Joined: December 7th, 2005, 8:36 pm
Re: SM Nightly Build January 2017
AT LEAST 2 to 3 weeks.DN123ABC wrote: 2 to 3 weeks have passed. Where is this "beta"?