marty60 wrote:Ok Ulf3000, you'll be the go-to man .
Did you really read what he wrote? He is definitely not a go to man more like a I don't really know script kiddy
userChrome.css after XUL dies
74 posts
• Page 5 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Did you really read what he wrote? He is definitely not a go to man more like a I don't really know script kiddy What sort of man would put a known criminal in charge of a major branch of government? Apart from, say, the average voter.
"Terry Pratchett"
The comment was tongue-in-cheek :--). Someone will come up with a hack though, I'm counting on it.
Should have realized ](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif "Brick wall") What sort of man would put a known criminal in charge of a major branch of government? Apart from, say, the average voter.
"Terry Pratchett"
if you know better than please tell me how the stylesheetservice is replaced , lol of course i don´t know how exactly mozilla will remove old technology and what their code looks like , i need to take a look at the stuff when it releases ,  (as will do countless other people), but everything points to an easy solution as my example with the internal addons(which are still bootstrapped, ) points out ! the webextension loader it self is also just a bootstrap btw fact is all the internals -> chrome,c-types and xul are still at the core of FF57 and beyond .
Off you go script kiddy your credability is now aproaching zero come back when you actually know things.
What sort of man would put a known criminal in charge of a major branch of government? Apart from, say, the average voter.
"Terry Pratchett"
lol ymmd
i rather trust the guys who developed the sdk and now webextension modules ( which are easy to contact over irc btw!!! oO) than you ... ill come back here and quote your post once ff57 is out a few days and own you, right now you seem like the resident troll over here , so why even argue ... edit: are you guys really that numb ? here read this bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1253419 to understand that everything in firefox is based on xul elements and will stay so for webextension ... ONLY THE ACCESS to this stuff is prohibited to addon devs but will be slowly and carefully exposed via firefox exclusive webext modules (or not)... unbranded builds of firefox will still be able to load bootstrapped extensions for experimentation and ! 
Like Andy McKay, for example? He would appear to be getting a few reality checks lately about how the world works. That aside, you are bringing nothing new to the table - XUL is lurking in FF57+, Nightly can load bootstraps, etc.......er...we-already-know-that. It is not relevant to the average user.
I think that's a bit accurate -
Sorry to hear that you have been ill.  Metal Lion latest SeaMonkey & Thunderbird Themes - Sea Monkey and Silver Sea Monkey
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke (attrib.)
.
 I can't believe this thread is still alive. . FF 81.0.1 - FF 82b7 - FF 83a - TB 78.3.2 - Mac OSX 10.13.6
It may be alive but it's very ill.
Very well put! . FF 81.0.1 - FF 82b7 - FF 83a - TB 78.3.2 - Mac OSX 10.13.6
might be an idea to close it once 57 is Released? same with my THread about the Old Extensions viewtopic.php?f=23&t=3025513
You guys might want to remind yourselves what this thread is about -
viewtopic.php?p=14747115#p14747115 viewtopic.php?p=14747387#p14747387 ....and then maybe read this Bug? - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1416044 viewtopic.php?p=14747189#p14747189 viewtopic.php?p=14783111#p14783111 Hmm, someone seems to have had a slight change of tune? Metal Lion latest SeaMonkey & Thunderbird Themes - Sea Monkey and Silver Sea Monkey
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke (attrib.)
.
As the OP of this 10 month old thread I have decided to put it out of its misery. Locking. . FF 81.0.1 - FF 82b7 - FF 83a - TB 78.3.2 - Mac OSX 10.13.6
74 posts
Page 5 of 5 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
