Did you really read what he wrote? He is definitely not a go to man more like a I don't really know script kiddymarty60 wrote: Ok Ulf3000, you'll be the go-to man .
userChrome.css after XUL dies
- malliz
- Folder@Home
- Posts: 43796
- Joined: December 7th, 2002, 4:34 am
- Location: Australia
Re: userChrome.css after XUL dies
What sort of man would put a known criminal in charge of a major branch of government? Apart from, say, the average voter.
"Terry Pratchett"
"Terry Pratchett"
-
- Posts: 475
- Joined: March 21st, 2012, 7:09 am
Re: userChrome.css after XUL dies
The comment was tongue-in-cheek :--). Someone will come up with a hack though, I'm counting on it.malliz wrote:Did you really read what he wrote? He is definitely not a go to man more like a I don't really know script kiddy
- malliz
- Folder@Home
- Posts: 43796
- Joined: December 7th, 2002, 4:34 am
- Location: Australia
Re: userChrome.css after XUL dies
Should have realizedmarty60 wrote: The comment was tongue-in-cheek
What sort of man would put a known criminal in charge of a major branch of government? Apart from, say, the average voter.
"Terry Pratchett"
"Terry Pratchett"
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: February 17th, 2017, 9:02 am
Re: userChrome.css after XUL dies
malliz wrote:Did you really read what he wrote? He is definitely not a go to man more like a I don't really know script kiddymarty60 wrote: Ok Ulf3000, you'll be the go-to man .
if you know better than please tell me how the stylesheetservice is replaced , lol
of course i don´t know how exactly mozilla will remove old technology and what their code looks like , i need to take a look at the stuff when it releases , (as will do countless other people),
but everything points to an easy solution as my example with the internal addons(which are still bootstrapped, ) points out ! the webextension loader it self is also just a bootstrap btw
fact is all the internals -> chrome,c-types and xul are still at the core of FF57 and beyond .
- malliz
- Folder@Home
- Posts: 43796
- Joined: December 7th, 2002, 4:34 am
- Location: Australia
Re: userChrome.css after XUL dies
Off you go script kiddy your credability is now aproaching zero come back when you actually know things.
What sort of man would put a known criminal in charge of a major branch of government? Apart from, say, the average voter.
"Terry Pratchett"
"Terry Pratchett"
-
- Posts: 4480
- Joined: March 19th, 2005, 10:51 am
Re: userChrome.css after XUL dies
lol ymmdxul are still at the core of FF57
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: February 17th, 2017, 9:02 am
Re: userChrome.css after XUL dies
i rather trust the guys who developed the sdk and now webextension modules ( which are easy to contact over irc btw!!! oO) than you ...malliz wrote:Off you go script kiddy your credability is now aproaching zero come back when you actually know things.
ill come back here and quote your post once ff57 is out a few days and own you, right now you seem like the resident troll over here , so why even argue ...
edit: are you guys really that numb ?
here read this bug
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1253419
to understand that everything in firefox is based on xul elements and will stay so for webextension ... ONLY THE ACCESS to this stuff is prohibited to addon devs but will be slowly and carefully exposed via firefox exclusive webext modules (or not)...
unbranded builds of firefox will still be able to load bootstrapped extensions for experimentation and !
- Frank Lion
- Posts: 21177
- Joined: April 23rd, 2004, 6:59 pm
- Location: ... The Exorcist....United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: userChrome.css after XUL dies
Like Andy McKay, for example? He would appear to be getting a few reality checks lately about how the world works.Ulf3000 wrote:i rather trust the guys who developed the sdk and now webextension modules ( which are easy to contact over irc btw!!! oO) than you ...
That aside, you are bringing nothing new to the table - XUL is lurking in FF57+, Nightly can load bootstraps, etc.......er...we-already-know-that. It is not relevant to the average user.
I think that's a bit accurate -Ulf3000 wrote:don´t you think thats a bit rude ?Frank Lion wrote:This guy isn't - http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... #p14731838GHM113 wrote:I am so terrible at programming...
We really can't keep flogging this one to death, you know. You guys need to figure if Aris knows what he's talking about or if you are just going to believe every pre-teen that wanders in off the street and tells you what you want to hear.
Ulf3000 wrote:ill come back here and quote your post once ff57 is out a few days and own you
Sorry to hear that you have been ill.Ulf3000 on AMO wrote:ill port it to webextension system sometime in the coming months, ill re-evaluate then.
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke (attrib.)
.
.
- RobertJ
- Moderator
- Posts: 10880
- Joined: October 15th, 2003, 7:40 pm
- Location: Chicago IL/Oconomowoc WI
Re: userChrome.css after XUL dies
.
I can't believe this thread is still alive.
.
I can't believe this thread is still alive.
.
FF 92.0 - TB 78.13 - Mac OSX 10.13.6
-
- Posts: 190
- Joined: January 28th, 2014, 2:18 pm
Re: userChrome.css after XUL dies
It may be alive but it's very ill.
- RobertJ
- Moderator
- Posts: 10880
- Joined: October 15th, 2003, 7:40 pm
- Location: Chicago IL/Oconomowoc WI
Re: userChrome.css after XUL dies
Very well put!LewS wrote:It may be alive but it's very ill.
.
FF 92.0 - TB 78.13 - Mac OSX 10.13.6
-
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: April 11th, 2014, 7:34 pm
- Location: Sydney Australia
Re: userChrome.css after XUL dies
might be an idea to close it once 57 is Released? same with my THread about the Old Extensions http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... &t=3025513RobertJ wrote:Very well put!LewS wrote:It may be alive but it's very ill.
.
- Frank Lion
- Posts: 21177
- Joined: April 23rd, 2004, 6:59 pm
- Location: ... The Exorcist....United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: userChrome.css after XUL dies
You guys might want to remind yourselves what this thread is about -
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... #p14747115
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... #p14747387
....and then maybe read this Bug? - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1416044
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... #p14747189
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... #p14783111
Hmm, someone seems to have had a slight change of tune?
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... #p14747115
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... #p14747387
....and then maybe read this Bug? - https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1416044
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... #p14747189
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... #p14783111
Hmm, someone seems to have had a slight change of tune?
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke (attrib.)
.
.
- RobertJ
- Moderator
- Posts: 10880
- Joined: October 15th, 2003, 7:40 pm
- Location: Chicago IL/Oconomowoc WI
Re: userChrome.css after XUL dies
.
As the OP of this 10 month old thread I have decided to put it out of its misery. Locking.
.
As the OP of this 10 month old thread I have decided to put it out of its misery. Locking.
.
FF 92.0 - TB 78.13 - Mac OSX 10.13.6