Mozilla's Manifest V3-FAQ
just saw this,
Mozilla’s Manifest v3 FAQ
- Snake4
- Posts: 1841
- Joined: December 27th, 2017, 4:03 am
- Location: Australia
- therube
- Posts: 21714
- Joined: March 10th, 2004, 9:59 pm
- Location: Maryland USA
Re: Mozilla’s Manifest v3 FAQ
More of the same, no-speak, double-speak.
- In the absence of a true standard for browser extensions
- We have no immediate plans to remove
- We are currently investigating
- We are evaluating the proposal
What would be nice to hear is, "No! We will continue to do what is right for the user, for the community, for the web.".
(Heh.)
- In the absence of a true standard for browser extensions
- We have no immediate plans to remove
- We are currently investigating
- We are evaluating the proposal
What would be nice to hear is, "No! We will continue to do what is right for the user, for the community, for the web.".
(Heh.)
Fire 750, bring back 250.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
- therube
- Posts: 21714
- Joined: March 10th, 2004, 9:59 pm
- Location: Maryland USA
Re: Mozilla’s Manifest v3 FAQ
SEP 3 2019just saw this,
You're late to the show.
(Wish I had realized that date to begin with. I thought there was something new being posted.)
WebExtensions changes coming?
Fire 750, bring back 250.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
- mightyglydd
- Posts: 9813
- Joined: November 4th, 2006, 7:07 pm
- Location: Hollywood Ca.
Re: Mozilla’s Manifest v3 FAQ
therube wrote:SEP 3 2019
Date of article; first thing one looks at isn't it!?
Key word, "no immediate plan"
There were extensive discussions........elsewhere.
Damn shame that 'zine became the last place to keep up with all things MozCo.
#KeepFightingMichael and Alex.
- Frank Lion
- Posts: 21178
- Joined: April 23rd, 2004, 6:59 pm
- Location: ... The Exorcist....United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: Mozilla’s Manifest v3 FAQ
Once upon a time, Firefox extension and theme writers would have picked up on Mozilla 'breaking news' immediately, because the Dev Control Panel has a feed showing this sort of stuff.mightyglydd wrote:Damn shame that 'zine became the last place to keep up with all things MozCo.
These days, no one themes for Firefox (or even Thunderbird recently), UI extensions are mainly gone and the new breed of content Webextension extension writers have no affinity or interest in Firefox. Content extension writers have always been a different breed really.
Firefox users may also have noticed a lack of good accurate .css snippets for Firefox these days (although Aris, dickvl and morat still sort of fly the flag) and the above is the reason for that as well.
NB. "no immediate plan" - became a buzz term around 2009, when they had no immediate plans to remove the statusbar and then, err, removed it. Been a useful 'get out of jail' term for them ever since.
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke (attrib.)
.
.
-
- Posts: 4480
- Joined: March 19th, 2005, 10:51 am
Re: Mozilla’s Manifest v3 FAQ
google store refused the latest ublock build from gorhill. if he will continue with firefox he maybe should change code but he currently wont run into the limits google will make to chrome.
- Snake4
- Posts: 1841
- Joined: December 27th, 2017, 4:03 am
- Location: Australia
Re: Mozilla’s Manifest v3 FAQ
yeah i only just saw the date after i posted it heretherube wrote:SEP 3 2019just saw this,
You're late to the show.
(Wish I had realized that date to begin with. I thought there was something new being posted.)
WebExtensions changes coming?
i didnt even know about that forum you linked to above