pag77 wrote:… without the possibility of updating …
Do you have the option to Upload a New Version? Загрузить новую версию
Here, for example:
[EXT] S3.Translator
Do you have the option to Upload a New Version? Загрузить новую версию Here, for example:
Elhem Enohpi, please: did you find the unwanted connections with Waterfox Classic alone? If also found with Firefox: which version?
No. Admins removed this button from extension page
Thank you.
I imagine that in some cases – including soft blocks (such as the one that Perhaps your first view of the page, before the seven minutes passed, included a cached view of things that should have been hidden from the outset? A guess. If not automated: perhaps someone at Mozilla chose to temporarily prevent upload – pending investigations around the existing soft block. Again, a guess. If you are not already aware, a gentle hint that policies were updated by Mozilla in June 2019. Publicised in advance – Add-on Policy and Process Updates | Mozilla Add-ons Blog – with invitations to comment in Mozilla Discourse. Defocusing from S3.Translator Since June, there have been occasional surges in blocking activity. I have not paid great attention but the surge at the end of November 2019 was remarkable https://redd.it/e3yzh6 and (if I understand correctly) one of the requests during that week was so broad-ranging that it unexpectedly caused crashes or performance issues for a small percentage of users. For anyone with an interest: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1603115 was updated sixteen hours ago. Occasionally I spend time in IRC chat. I sense that most AMO people attend to issues (with great focus) on weekdays; without working at the weekend … Your extensions As Mozilla showed "good faith" relating to misunderstandings in 2015, I hope that the same will be shown on this occasion. HTH Kind regards Graham Last edited by grahamperrin on December 23rd, 2019, 3:11 am, edited 2 times in total.
Can we get this thread back on topic? It's about a specific extension, not for discussion of AMO or it's policies.
Sorry,
the block is policy-based – and discrete. I thought that it would help the developer (and other readers) to have some context about changes, and consequences, in recent months. As an alternative we have – and Mozilla prefers – https://discourse.mozilla.org/c/add-ons
Perhaps it would, but not in this thread.
Initially with home-built Waterfox Classic 2019.12 (20191210201058) on FreeBSD-CURRENT. Reproducible with Mozilla Firefox 71.0 (20191208150541) on the same system:  
Screen recording: https://put.re/player/G9vC3Fhd.mp4
It's old version... I can’t understand why the data collection occurs with the settings "disabled", so in the current version the algorithm of statistics is completely deactivated md5 for current version: CA949C9F25F18CE91F3A51362C187610 sha256 for current version: 477D2308F84D667B2FEB44CFB12035351D65A861112DF2E1452EFB5F9DF29BDF
Any news about a version to work in Thunderbird 68+?
It would help if you would answer, even if just to say you definitely aren't going to make one - then I could unsubscribe from this thread and stop hoping.
Thunderbird 68 began to switch to WebExtensions. Unfortunately at the moment they have abandoned some of the old APIs, but have not yet created new ones. https://developer.thunderbird.net/add-ons/tb68/changes As a result, now this situation: the old XUL version of the extension can no longer work, and the new WebExtensions version can not work yet You can install Thunderbird 60 ESR Last version: 60.9.1 , November 5, 2019 https://www.thunderbird.net/en-US/thund ... easenotes/
S3.Translator s3firefox@translator1 6.25 477d2308f84d667b2feb44cfb12035351d65a861112df2e1452efb5f9df29bdf 2019-12-24 19:40
OK, I probably tested:
I now have:
Re: viewtopic.php?p=14852228#p14852228 point 1 (collection of ancillary user data) s3firefox@translator1 477d2308f84d667b2feb44cfb12035351d65a861112df2e1452efb5f9df29bdf appears to be OK, at a glance: https://put.re/player/j9265Vbc.mp4 To avoid confusion, please, can you make available a file that uses a distinctive version number for the end result? A non-blocked version 6.25 alongside a blocked version 6.25 may cause confusion. Also I assume that today's 6.25 477d2308f84d667b2feb44cfb12035351d65a861112df2e1452efb5f9df29bdf is significantly different from the 6.25 in Chrome Web Store. Three installations of 6.25:  Given the signifant difference of today's 6.25 for Firefox from the earlier distributions of 6.25:
Also use distinctive file names, if you like. Thanks again Last edited by grahamperrin on December 26th, 2019, 9:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Oleksander, for your information:
https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/-/50245?u=grahamperrin I do not know timescales, sorry.
A guess (I am not a developer): compare content/statistics.js lines 31 and 35 ("on" and "off") with content/statistics_go.js line 117 (previously line 116),
Instead, this?
---- Still, I wonder whether Mozilla will treat the statistics as ancillary – even when the user does agree to collection. For Firefox, for this extension, maybe advisable to never collect statistics of this type. HTH
Any chances to see this add-on working for TB 71+ in the near future (and please don't forget users of Linux, like Mint or other Ubuntu based ones)?
The main problem for Linux users is an often non working bubble (=the small translator icon appearing below any marked text) or a translation window which doesn't fit in any TB theme. Return to Extension/Theme Releases Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|