Just curious. This throws off the numbering scheme used in the past, where the SM version was "2." plus the Gecko version minus 3. So what happened? Is this actually SM 2.57 in disguise?
I don't have the source here I can look at, but the list of about:config features does look more like Firefox 56 than Firefox 60, tbh.
Why does SeaMonkey 2.53 say "rv:60.0"?
- Pim
- Posts: 2215
- Joined: May 17th, 2004, 2:04 pm
- Location: Netherlands
Why does SeaMonkey 2.53 say "rv:60.0"?
Last edited by Pim on February 18th, 2020, 9:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Groetjes, Pim
- therube
- Posts: 21722
- Joined: March 10th, 2004, 9:59 pm
- Location: Maryland USA
Re: Why does SeaMonkey 2.53 say "rv:60.0"?
Oh, I believe it's something like...
sites complain when you use a "too old" browser,
so while 2.53 is not "60", 60 could be enough to get you past problematic websites
and while 2.53 is "56", it also includes backports or other parts of later FF versions,
so it is not 56 "exclusively"
sites complain when you use a "too old" browser,
so while 2.53 is not "60", 60 could be enough to get you past problematic websites
and while 2.53 is "56", it also includes backports or other parts of later FF versions,
so it is not 56 "exclusively"
Fire 750, bring back 250.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript