Sites not accepting Seamonkey
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: October 8th, 2019, 3:47 am
Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey
Hello,
Could you please advise how to bypass browser checking here https://vod.tvp.pl/video/hotel-zacisze, ... a,47040736 ?
All the best
Could you please advise how to bypass browser checking here https://vod.tvp.pl/video/hotel-zacisze, ... a,47040736 ?
All the best
- -Px-
- Posts: 480
- Joined: April 20th, 2011, 1:56 am
Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey
One more well-known site stopped working in SeaMonkey
https://imgur.com/CtAMLi3
Error in console:
ReferenceError: ResizeObserver is not defined
According to https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/doc ... zeObserver this API was added in FF 69...
https://imgur.com/CtAMLi3
Error in console:
ReferenceError: ResizeObserver is not defined
According to https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/doc ... zeObserver this API was added in FF 69...
- fixit7
- Posts: 233
- Joined: May 19th, 2015, 3:11 pm
- Frank Lion
- Posts: 21178
- Joined: April 23rd, 2004, 6:59 pm
- Location: ... The Exorcist....United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey
Works for me, - https://imgur.com/nvs86Az
Then again I ain't daft, I'm using the right link for that site - https://imgur.com/beta/disable
Then again I ain't daft, I'm using the right link for that site - https://imgur.com/beta/disable
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke (attrib.)
.
.
- -Px-
- Posts: 480
- Joined: April 20th, 2011, 1:56 am
Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey
Seems that works only for registered usersFrank Lion wrote:Then again I ain't daft, I'm using the right link for that site - https://imgur.com/beta/disable
- Frank Lion
- Posts: 21178
- Joined: April 23rd, 2004, 6:59 pm
- Location: ... The Exorcist....United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey
I don't usually use that site and am not a 'registered user' there and I was testing this using SeaMonkey....and, it works for me.-Px- wrote:Seems that works only for registered users
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke (attrib.)
.
.
- -Px-
- Posts: 480
- Joined: April 20th, 2011, 1:56 am
Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey
Unfortunately, for me it is not working. Main page works just fine, but clicking any image gives me a grey screen. Same on clean profile with 2.53.5/2.57Frank Lion wrote:I don't usually use that site and am not a 'registered user' there and I was testing this using SeaMonkey....and, it works for me.-Px- wrote:Seems that works only for registered users
- Frank Lion
- Posts: 21178
- Joined: April 23rd, 2004, 6:59 pm
- Location: ... The Exorcist....United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey
You need to think outside the box here --Px- wrote:Unfortunately, for me it is not working. Main page works just fine, but clicking any image gives me a grey screen. Same on clean profile with 2.53.5/2.57
it's like the old YouTube fix from years back, you do a one-off click of the beta disable link above and it sets a cookie to direct future visits to their non-beta site. So, check your cookie permissions for that site.
I'm allowing cookies for that one site and the site fully works and persists across restarts. I am also using uBlock Origin there. Try testing link here - http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... #p14871037
New profiles, etc will not help as SM just doesn't support (atm) the feature they included in their Beta page (which they use by default)
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke (attrib.)
.
.
-
- Posts: 381
- Joined: November 13th, 2004, 7:03 pm
- Location: Alabama
Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey
Add glassdoor.com to the list. It croaks if I try to login via my Google acct. Console says "Incompatible Browser".
- Frank Lion
- Posts: 21178
- Joined: April 23rd, 2004, 6:59 pm
- Location: ... The Exorcist....United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey
..or 1.7 Billion Minus 1, is another way to look at it.Justinh wrote:Add glassdoor.com to the list. .
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/09/ ... are-there/
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke (attrib.)
.
.
-
- Posts: 1361
- Joined: December 15th, 2015, 1:20 pm
Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey
imgur should work in tomorrows 2.53.5b1 pre. Found the error in the resizeObserver implementation causing leaks and enabled it as default.
- -Px-
- Posts: 480
- Joined: April 20th, 2011, 1:56 am
Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey
Confluence stopped working in SeaMonkey 2.53.3, showing "Browser not supported" message. Useragent override didn't help, so seems they are checking some capabilities, which are absent now
- -Px-
- Posts: 480
- Joined: April 20th, 2011, 1:56 am
Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey
Ok, seems they broke Waterfox too, as a part of dropping IE11 support
https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Feed ... -p/1185312
https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Feed ... -p/1185312
- therube
- Posts: 21714
- Joined: March 10th, 2004, 9:59 pm
- Location: Maryland USA
Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey
(Heh. SeaMonkey users are crawling out of the woodwork, over there.
So Atlassian is one of the companies out there making the world more, solely, Chrome-centric. So obviously they have absolutely no interest in SeaMonkey, Pale Moon, Waterfox [Classic]..., & then only a cursory acknowledgement that FF [Quantum] even exists.)
So Atlassian is one of the companies out there making the world more, solely, Chrome-centric. So obviously they have absolutely no interest in SeaMonkey, Pale Moon, Waterfox [Classic]..., & then only a cursory acknowledgement that FF [Quantum] even exists.)
Fire 750, bring back 250.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
-
- Posts: 785
- Joined: June 24th, 2009, 1:07 pm
Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey
then let's find an "alternative" to Atlassian (if there is one out there)therube wrote:(Heh. SeaMonkey users are crawling out of the woodwork, over there.
So Atlassian is one of the companies out there making the world more, solely, Chrome-centric. So obviously they have absolutely no interest in SeaMonkey, Pale Moon, Waterfox [Classic]..., & then only a cursory acknowledgement that FF [Quantum] even exists.)
I wonder if imgur will work with the SM 2.57.x builds - I'm permanently switching to 2.57.x builds whether finalized or not for the remainder of 2020 and around the start of 2021frg wrote:imgur should work in tomorrows 2.53.5b1 pre. Found the error in the resizeObserver implementation causing leaks and enabled it as default.