Sites not accepting Seamonkey

User Help for Seamonkey and Mozilla Suite
paero123
Posts: 18
Joined: October 8th, 2019, 3:47 am

Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey

Post by paero123 »

Hello,
Could you please advise how to bypass browser checking here https://vod.tvp.pl/video/hotel-zacisze, ... a,47040736 ?
All the best
User avatar
-Px-
Posts: 480
Joined: April 20th, 2011, 1:56 am

Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey

Post by -Px- »

One more well-known site stopped working in SeaMonkey
https://imgur.com/CtAMLi3
Error in console:
ReferenceError: ResizeObserver is not defined
According to https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/doc ... zeObserver this API was added in FF 69...
User avatar
fixit7
Posts: 233
Joined: May 19th, 2015, 3:11 pm

Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey

Post by fixit7 »

It works for me.

https://imgur.com/
User avatar
Frank Lion
Posts: 21177
Joined: April 23rd, 2004, 6:59 pm
Location: ... The Exorcist....United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey

Post by Frank Lion »

Works for me, - https://imgur.com/nvs86Az

Then again I ain't daft, I'm using the right link for that site - https://imgur.com/beta/disable




Image
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke (attrib.)
.
User avatar
-Px-
Posts: 480
Joined: April 20th, 2011, 1:56 am

Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey

Post by -Px- »

Frank Lion wrote:Then again I ain't daft, I'm using the right link for that site - https://imgur.com/beta/disable
Seems that works only for registered users
User avatar
Frank Lion
Posts: 21177
Joined: April 23rd, 2004, 6:59 pm
Location: ... The Exorcist....United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey

Post by Frank Lion »

-Px- wrote:Seems that works only for registered users
I don't usually use that site and am not a 'registered user' there and I was testing this using SeaMonkey....and, it works for me.
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke (attrib.)
.
User avatar
-Px-
Posts: 480
Joined: April 20th, 2011, 1:56 am

Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey

Post by -Px- »

Frank Lion wrote:
-Px- wrote:Seems that works only for registered users
I don't usually use that site and am not a 'registered user' there and I was testing this using SeaMonkey....and, it works for me.
Unfortunately, for me it is not working. Main page works just fine, but clicking any image gives me a grey screen. Same on clean profile with 2.53.5/2.57
User avatar
Frank Lion
Posts: 21177
Joined: April 23rd, 2004, 6:59 pm
Location: ... The Exorcist....United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey

Post by Frank Lion »

-Px- wrote:Unfortunately, for me it is not working. Main page works just fine, but clicking any image gives me a grey screen. Same on clean profile with 2.53.5/2.57
You need to think outside the box here -

it's like the old YouTube fix from years back, you do a one-off click of the beta disable link above and it sets a cookie to direct future visits to their non-beta site. So, check your cookie permissions for that site.

I'm allowing cookies for that one site and the site fully works and persists across restarts. I am also using uBlock Origin there. Try testing link here - http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic ... #p14871037

New profiles, etc will not help as SM just doesn't support (atm) the feature they included in their Beta page (which they use by default)
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke (attrib.)
.
Justinh
Posts: 381
Joined: November 13th, 2004, 7:03 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey

Post by Justinh »

Add glassdoor.com to the list. It croaks if I try to login via my Google acct. Console says "Incompatible Browser".
User avatar
Frank Lion
Posts: 21177
Joined: April 23rd, 2004, 6:59 pm
Location: ... The Exorcist....United Kingdom
Contact:

Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey

Post by Frank Lion »

Justinh wrote:Add glassdoor.com to the list. .
..or 1.7 Billion Minus 1, is another way to look at it.

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/09/ ... are-there/
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke (attrib.)
.
frg
Posts: 1361
Joined: December 15th, 2015, 1:20 pm

Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey

Post by frg »

imgur should work in tomorrows 2.53.5b1 pre. Found the error in the resizeObserver implementation causing leaks and enabled it as default.
User avatar
-Px-
Posts: 480
Joined: April 20th, 2011, 1:56 am

Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey

Post by -Px- »

Confluence stopped working in SeaMonkey 2.53.3, showing "Browser not supported" message. Useragent override didn't help, so seems they are checking some capabilities, which are absent now
User avatar
-Px-
Posts: 480
Joined: April 20th, 2011, 1:56 am

Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey

Post by -Px- »

Ok, seems they broke Waterfox too, as a part of dropping IE11 support :D
https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Feed ... -p/1185312
User avatar
therube
Posts: 21714
Joined: March 10th, 2004, 9:59 pm
Location: Maryland USA

Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey

Post by therube »

(Heh. SeaMonkey users are crawling out of the woodwork, over there.

So Atlassian is one of the companies out there making the world more, solely, Chrome-centric. So obviously they have absolutely no interest in SeaMonkey, Pale Moon, Waterfox [Classic]..., & then only a cursory acknowledgement that FF [Quantum] even exists.)
Fire 750, bring back 250.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 Pinball CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
4td8s
Posts: 784
Joined: June 24th, 2009, 1:07 pm

Re: Sites not accepting Seamonkey

Post by 4td8s »

therube wrote:(Heh. SeaMonkey users are crawling out of the woodwork, over there.

So Atlassian is one of the companies out there making the world more, solely, Chrome-centric. So obviously they have absolutely no interest in SeaMonkey, Pale Moon, Waterfox [Classic]..., & then only a cursory acknowledgement that FF [Quantum] even exists.)
then let's find an "alternative" to Atlassian (if there is one out there)
frg wrote:imgur should work in tomorrows 2.53.5b1 pre. Found the error in the resizeObserver implementation causing leaks and enabled it as default.
I wonder if imgur will work with the SM 2.57.x builds - I'm permanently switching to 2.57.x builds whether finalized or not for the remainder of 2020 and around the start of 2021
Post Reply