[Ext] Drag de Go 0.2.5
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: March 23rd, 2007, 11:04 am
Conflict with "Grab and Drag"
Thank you for your nice extension which I can't live without.
It seems it has a conflict with the "Grab and Drag" extension because if it is enabled then I cannot use yours.
I hope you can do something about it.
It seems it has a conflict with the "Grab and Drag" extension because if it is enabled then I cannot use yours.
I hope you can do something about it.
-
- Posts: 382
- Joined: November 3rd, 2003, 1:06 am
Re: doesn't work with firefox3.0a4
yzhgu wrote:doesn't work with firefox3.0a4
neither 3.0b2pre
-
- Posts: 382
- Joined: November 3rd, 2003, 1:06 am
Re: doesn't work with firefox3.0a4
IdoMcFly wrote:yzhgu wrote:doesn't work with firefox3.0a4
neither 3.0b2pre
I was talking about the dev version of drag de go (2.5.1)
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9b2pre) Gecko/2007112204 Minefield/3.0b2pre - Build ID: 2007112204
- daTerminehtor
- Posts: 379
- Joined: November 9th, 2004, 12:11 pm
- Location: Great White North
Amend search string?
I use this...
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?a ... =100&hl=en
as my home page. Any way to use this as the search string for dragging text?
http://www.google.com/advanced_search?a ... =100&hl=en
as my home page. Any way to use this as the search string for dragging text?
- GrailKnight
- Posts: 2359
- Joined: January 5th, 2004, 5:40 am
- Location: Pennsylvania, USA
Bo102010 wrote:The build I posted here does work on the new betas and the trunk, so far!
Thanks.
Working fine with latest hourly tk v3b2pre builds.
"There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact". - Sherlock Holmes
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: February 26th, 2005, 4:44 am
- Location: Helsinki, Finland
XML reading bug
Hello,
Drag de Go 0.2.5 has been useful for me for long time - thanks!
However, I've noticed that it seems to totally mess up the layout of any XML file being viewed, when using the vertical scrollbar. I narrowed this behavior down to this extension. So, fixing this would make at least one xml developer happy.
Drag de Go 0.2.5 has been useful for me for long time - thanks!
However, I've noticed that it seems to totally mess up the layout of any XML file being viewed, when using the vertical scrollbar. I narrowed this behavior down to this extension. So, fixing this would make at least one xml developer happy.
-
- Posts: 206
- Joined: January 2nd, 2008, 7:07 am
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: August 22nd, 2006, 2:29 am
request 1: "open link in new focused tab" and the other "open" commands are only available for active links. But they would also be useful for non-active URLs. Those are treated as text by Drag De Go. So they can only be searched, not opened.
request2: allow some RegExp actions on the dragged text or link before passing it along to search or opening it. For example, if a dragged non-active URL starts with hxxp (somed active lintimes used in forum posts to avoiks) the user could make a RegExp function that converts that to http.
request2: allow some RegExp actions on the dragged text or link before passing it along to search or opening it. For example, if a dragged non-active URL starts with hxxp (somed active lintimes used in forum posts to avoiks) the user could make a RegExp function that converts that to http.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: January 14th, 2008, 4:16 pm
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: February 17th, 2008, 8:07 pm
When I checked the truck and dev versions, they didn't work. I manually loaded up the .xpi file and changed the <em> to 4.0 (not that this will work with version 4). You can download the trunk one and update the install.rdf file yourself, or I have uploaded the modified version of it here.
http://drop.io/dragdego
This works for me as of 2/17/2008 and FF3b3
http://drop.io/dragdego
This works for me as of 2/17/2008 and FF3b3
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: December 18th, 2003, 3:30 pm
I also updated the version I had posted previously, which had some fixes included for the trunk: http://bo.idiofx.com/dragDeGoTrunk.xpi
-
- Posts: 87
- Joined: June 26th, 2007, 6:17 pm
It's really a marvellous extension and I have been used it with great comfort for many hours. It's worth more notices and applauses indeed. anyway, I think it's too excessive that it will be used in the addons and source codes. Imagine that you see a valuable addon, you must click to install by trial at once, nobody will save it in the local folder and then open the folder and find that addon to install...it's too troublesome, isn't it? and that's the same with source codes.