MozillaZine

Acid3 Test

Talk about the native Mac OS X browser.

Moderator: Camino Developers

macwish
 
Posts: 89
Joined: February 11th, 2004, 3:08 pm
March 13th, 2008, 4:06 am

Post Posted March 13th, 2008, 4:06 am

The new Acid3 Test is out (http://acid3.acidtests.org). Acid3 is apparently much more complicated than Acid2, but Camino seems to do better than Safari, IE, Omniweb, or iCab.
On my Core 2 Duo MacBook
Camnio 1.5.5: 52/100
Safari 3.0.4: 39/100
Internet Explorer 5.2.4 (unable to complete test at all)
Omniweb 5.6: 39/100
iCab 4.0.1: 39/100
G4 iMac, 512 MB RAM, OS X 10.4.11, Camino 1.6.10; 2 Ghz Core 2 Duo MacBook, 2 GB RAM, OS X 10.6.1, Camino 2.0b4

ozean
 
Posts: 280
Joined: July 20th, 2003, 6:22 am
Location: Oslo
March 13th, 2008, 5:21 am

Post Posted March 13th, 2008, 5:21 am

As you can see, Safari, Omniweb and iCab (beginning with version 4.x) all have the same score – that is because they use the same rendering engine offered by Mac OS X (Webkit).

The value currently reported for the Camino trunk build is 70. (I think it was 68 or 69 a few days ago, seems our dear devs made some progess!)

The value reported by the current Webkit nightlies is even higher (in the nineties, I think).

PS: I wonder what the value for the current branch nightlies is?

phiw13
 
Posts: 2210
Joined: November 7th, 2002, 1:00 am
Location: Japan
March 13th, 2008, 7:24 am

Post Posted March 13th, 2008, 7:24 am

ozean wrote:PS: I wonder what the value for the current branch nightlies is?

Not much different from Camino 1.5.x, I suppose. They share the same rendering engine (Gecko 1.8.1).
And I don't think the Acid 3 score will go much higher for Gecko 1.9 (FX 3, Camino 2), may be a few points, but not more. The rest of the work will go in Gecko 2.

The test is not so important…

ozean
 
Posts: 280
Joined: July 20th, 2003, 6:22 am
Location: Oslo
March 13th, 2008, 7:43 am

Post Posted March 13th, 2008, 7:43 am

phiw13 wrote:The test is not so important…

but it is fun! All these rectangles and some colors and things are happening, and things look strange and, erm … there is a score afterwards! :D

phiw13
 
Posts: 2210
Joined: November 7th, 2002, 1:00 am
Location: Japan
March 13th, 2008, 4:03 pm

Post Posted March 13th, 2008, 4:03 pm

ozean wrote:
phiw13 wrote:The test is not so important…

but it is fun! All these rectangles and some colors and things are happening, and things look strange and, erm … there is a score afterwards! :D

And shift-clicking on the 'A' ! :-).

SpaceCat85

User avatar
 
Posts: 80
Joined: March 24th, 2005, 11:41 am
March 13th, 2008, 8:13 pm

Post Posted March 13th, 2008, 8:13 pm

A few more for fun:
66/100 for Firefox 3.0b4
52/100, "fail", and a few kitties for Seamonkey 1.1.8
46/100 and lots of missing graphics for Opera 9.26
39/100, "fail", and a kitty for the current Omniweb 5.7a version, as expected
a paltry 26/100, "fail, and a kitty for Shiira 2.2, and
the same plus a crash for Demeter 1.0.8 (a fork of Shiira 1.2.2)
Firefox + Camino + SeaMonkey on Mac OS 10.5

jram
 
Posts: 86
Joined: March 17th, 2004, 11:12 am
March 13th, 2008, 8:50 pm

Post Posted March 13th, 2008, 8:50 pm

My results Camino 51/100
1.6 1.8
Safari 39/100
Opera 65/100
the winner WebKit 90/100

MackerAZ

User avatar
 
Posts: 17
Joined: October 28th, 2007, 8:38 am
March 13th, 2008, 10:31 pm

Post Posted March 13th, 2008, 10:31 pm

So why is WebKit so dang high!

ozean
 
Posts: 280
Joined: July 20th, 2003, 6:22 am
Location: Oslo
March 14th, 2008, 2:21 am

Post Posted March 14th, 2008, 2:21 am

MackerAZ wrote:So why is WebKit so dang high!

check out Hyatt’s last post in the webkit blog: http://webkit.org/blog/158/the-acid-3-test/

widge34

User avatar
 
Posts: 101
Joined: October 17th, 2005, 10:52 am
Location: Monmouth (UK)
March 14th, 2008, 9:31 am

Post Posted March 14th, 2008, 9:31 am

Here are my results.

Safari webkit latest nightly. 90/100

Opera 9.50 (Kesterel) 65/100

Firefox 3.0b 60/100

Camino latest nightly 51/100

Flock 50/100

Safari 3.0.4 39/100
Widge...

Intel iMac : 17inch : 2Ghz Core 2 Duo : 1GB Ram : 160GB HD: Dual layer Superdrive : iSight : Leopard 10.5.4

jcraig

User avatar
 
Posts: 1957
Joined: December 6th, 2002, 6:38 pm
Location: Plainfield, IL USA
March 14th, 2008, 11:47 am

Post Posted March 14th, 2008, 11:47 am

My latest Camino trunk (13 March) build scores 70/100.
There is no dark side of the moon, really. As a matter of fact, it's all dark.

Camino Trunk nightlies-O2 -prescott INTEL

jram
 
Posts: 86
Joined: March 17th, 2004, 11:12 am
March 15th, 2008, 7:32 am

Post Posted March 15th, 2008, 7:32 am

I went up 1 52/100 Camino 1.6 1.8
Webkit 90/100

Euchre

User avatar
 
Posts: 2799
Joined: April 16th, 2006, 12:48 pm
March 18th, 2008, 1:26 am

Post Posted March 18th, 2008, 1:26 am

OK, it's cool and all that Camino's current stable beats all the WebKit based current stables, but...

Camino 1.5.5 still doesn't pass the Acid2 test. Safari's current stable sure does. Now if I go test IE7 on XP and it passes Acid2 that'd be really shameful for Camino not to.
Gecko
One Rendering Engine to rule them all.

ishermandom

User avatar
 
Posts: 231
Joined: January 17th, 2005, 7:54 pm
Location: Stanford
March 18th, 2008, 3:28 am

Post Posted March 18th, 2008, 3:28 am

Camino 2.0 will pass the Acid2 test, just as Firefox 3 will/does. It would certainly be nice if Gecko saw more frequent updates, but I guess that's the price you pay for maintaining Gecko's high website compatibility.

phiw13
 
Posts: 2210
Joined: November 7th, 2002, 1:00 am
Location: Japan
March 18th, 2008, 3:38 am

Post Posted March 18th, 2008, 3:38 am

Euchre wrote:Now if I go test IE7 on XP and it passes Acid2 that'd be really shameful for Camino not to.

Don't worry, IE 7 doesn't pass the Acid test. By some miles. IE 8 beta (alpha) does, somehow, but that one is far from release quality.

And yes, Camino 2a1pre does past the test.

Return to Camino


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: NeXTLoop and 1 guest