official 2004-01-30 win32 branch is out

Discussion about official Mozilla Firefox builds
Post Reply
hvymtl
Posts: 168
Joined: October 2nd, 2003, 7:17 am
Location: Brasilia, Brazil

official 2004-01-30 win32 branch is out

Post by hvymtl »

GnuBeest
Posts: 51
Joined: July 14th, 2003, 1:25 am

Post by GnuBeest »

I smell fear. Or an impending milestone. It's hard to tell these days.
laketrout
Posts: 178
Joined: April 20th, 2003, 7:38 pm
Location: 4297.9 feet below the surface of Sudbury, Canada

Post by laketrout »

Build is working like a charm.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1b2) Gecko/20060912 BonEcho/2.0b2
Jack
Posts: 6859
Joined: December 26th, 2002, 4:53 pm

Post by Jack »

This is my first nightly since the 0.7 milestone, and it's working just great. I can't believe how many nice features and changes were made since the 0.7 release. The only complaint I have is with the new Tabbrowser Extensions version, LOL.
User avatar
Spewey
Folder@Home
Posts: 5799
Joined: January 25th, 2003, 2:06 pm
Location: St. Paul, Minnes°ta

Post by Spewey »

Me too (sorta). I went for fresh everything (plugins) and it all worked. No TBE/TBP though.

I have tortured myself with Moz 1.6 exclusively for a week and am very glad to be back to Fb.
Now they'll go and do a RC which I won't bother with. Oh well.
______________
So I sez to this build, I sez, "Come to poppa"
old momokatte
Posts: 0
Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm

Post by old momokatte »

Running great for me. Looks like all that's left is to change the product version number to 0.8 and they'll have a milestone.

I'm disappointed that the XPInstall regressions have been pushed to 0.9, since I was really looking forward to ripping the error/success messages out of my extension installers, but I'll get over it. Maybe.
User avatar
wget
Posts: 4701
Joined: November 8th, 2002, 9:51 am
Location: Denmark

Post by wget »

Spewey wrote:I have tortured myself with Moz 1.6 exclusively for a week and am very glad to be back to Fb.

Now wait a minute here!
Torniojaws
Posts: 68
Joined: January 12th, 2004, 3:07 pm
Location: Tornio, Finland
Contact:

Post by Torniojaws »

hmm, can you get a .zip version somewhere ?
johnleemk
Posts: 1464
Joined: October 29th, 2003, 6:19 am
Location: Malaysia
Contact:

Post by johnleemk »

Nope except through unofficial builds. Ben wants us to test the installers.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050205 Firefox/1.0+
User avatar
cityfan
Posts: 272
Joined: August 11th, 2003, 1:04 pm
Location: Ventura County, California

Post by cityfan »

johnleemk wrote:Nope except through unofficial builds. Ben wants us to test the installers.


Since the request to 'test the installer' - have there actually been any installer fixes since January 1st?
I haven't seen any visible changes made during that time, for example the 'Accept License agreement' is still set as being the default radio button etc.
User avatar
Spewey
Folder@Home
Posts: 5799
Joined: January 25th, 2003, 2:06 pm
Location: St. Paul, Minnes°ta

Post by Spewey »

Downloads don't cancel, URLbar + Alt-Enter leaves new URL on old tab, and Seamonkey still doesn't hold a candle to this newfangled Firebert thing. These things, I think, could put off new users.
sasquatch
Posts: 6022
Joined: November 25th, 2003, 8:56 am

Post by sasquatch »

djacks wrote:
johnleemk wrote:Nope except through unofficial builds. Ben wants us to test the installers.


Since the request to 'test the installer' - have there actually been any installer fixes since January 1st?
I haven't seen any visible changes made during that time, for example the 'Accept License agreement' is still set as being the default radio button etc.

Was wondering the same thing.

Heck these have been tested, but no "fixed" reports coming through that I've seen.
User avatar
Pike
Posts: 2293
Joined: August 10th, 2003, 12:12 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by Pike »

Post Reply