Firefox Win32 installer is no good
-
- Posts: 478
- Joined: July 21st, 2003, 4:45 am
- Location: Nottingham, UK
- Contact:
Firefox Win32 installer is no good
Problem 1) No way of creating a new directory. This means that if I want a different location to 'Program Files/Mozilla Firefox' (or whatever the default is), then it has to be an existing folder. Even typing a new directory name in there would have no effect. At best this was gonna end up throwing the Firefox files into a directory I didn't want them in, and at worst it would end up deleting everything already in there as reported by people testing the installer before. I'm told that on WinXP there is always the option to create a new folder, but on 98SE there is no 'new folder' button on the 'Browse for folder' window.
Problem 2) The installer creates an 'install_wizard.log' file during the install which it can't uninstall. This means that it can't uninstall properly without asking the user if they want to delete a directory that isn't empty. I expect most novice users - the people we're trying to help with an installer - won't be comfortable saying 'yes' to this question since they have no idea what else it might be deleting.
Is there a Zip of Firefox anywhere so I can test other features without having to use the installer?
Problem 2) The installer creates an 'install_wizard.log' file during the install which it can't uninstall. This means that it can't uninstall properly without asking the user if they want to delete a directory that isn't empty. I expect most novice users - the people we're trying to help with an installer - won't be comfortable saying 'yes' to this question since they have no idea what else it might be deleting.
Is there a Zip of Firefox anywhere so I can test other features without having to use the installer?
-
- Posts: 2417
- Joined: November 4th, 2002, 4:47 pm
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Re: Firefox Win32 installer is no good
Kylotan wrote:Is there a Zip of Firefox anywhere so I can test other features without having to use the installer?
Yes, there's a zip build linked from http://mozillanews.org/?article_date=20 ... 9+01-56-09
Alternatively, check the firefox builds forum here.
-
- Posts: 524
- Joined: February 3rd, 2004, 2:25 pm
I agree. The Win installer could be better. If you don't want to put the Firefox folder in the 'standard' place (which I never do - my hard drive is actually well organised), then changing directories is impossible without manually browsing in that little folder-choosing window, manually clicking 'New Folder' and manually entering a new name in. It should be more streamlined.
-
- Posts: 156
- Joined: November 4th, 2002, 11:57 pm
- Location: Canada, BC
- Contact:
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 0
- Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm
-
- Posts: 478
- Joined: July 21st, 2003, 4:45 am
- Location: Nottingham, UK
- Contact:
Spewey, you misread the marker; it actually says "this thread is marked Spewey = closed-minded fool".
And people here wonder why Firefox is considered unfriendly to newbies - it's idiots like you on the forums insulting people for having problems just because it works for you.
Firefox installer on XP: note important 'new folder' button.
<img src="http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ben.sizer/firefox_xp.jpg">
Firefox installer on 98SE: note total lack of important 'new folder' button.
<img src="http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ben.sizer/firefox_98se.jpg">
And people here wonder why Firefox is considered unfriendly to newbies - it's idiots like you on the forums insulting people for having problems just because it works for you.
Firefox installer on XP: note important 'new folder' button.
<img src="http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ben.sizer/firefox_xp.jpg">
Firefox installer on 98SE: note total lack of important 'new folder' button.
<img src="http://homepage.ntlworld.com/ben.sizer/firefox_98se.jpg">
-
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: October 29th, 2003, 6:19 am
- Location: Malaysia
- Contact:
Is that the "custom install" option? I think the custom install option has it. That's just what I think, though, as I haven't actually used the installer yet. IIRC, this was put in there to avoid a nasty bug that could delete everything in your program files.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050205 Firefox/1.0+
-
- Posts: 2417
- Joined: November 4th, 2002, 4:47 pm
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
johnleemk wrote:Is that the "custom install" option? I think the custom install option has it. That's just what I think, though, as I haven't actually used the installer yet. IIRC, this was put in there to avoid a nasty bug that could delete everything in your program files.
Yes, that is the stuff that comes up with the custom install. I don't have a Windows 98 here to test with (and I guess not many people do, hence the problem), but this means the custom install is pretty useless on Win98 (and presumably Win95 as well).
-
- Posts: 478
- Joined: July 21st, 2003, 4:45 am
- Location: Nottingham, UK
- Contact:
Both the above are from the custom install option. And andr3a, I'm not sure what your message is saying; if you're pointing out the hypocrisy of me insulting someone for being insulting, that's fair enough. I'm just fed up of the "it works for me - therefore you must be a moron" attitude some people show.
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: February 7th, 2004, 1:14 pm
I can recommend the following OPEN SOURCE installer for 0.9. I have used it often and it is very customizable. For as far I can see there would be no problems with the license either.
Inno Setup
Inno Setup