Turbo Launch (Quick Start)
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: November 18th, 2003, 1:48 am
Turbo Launch (Quick Start)
What's happened to the quick launch (where part of the program is kept in memory so it will launch faster)??? Will it be in Firebird? Anybody know?
- Peter(6)
- Posts: 13011
- Joined: September 4th, 2003, 1:26 am
- Location: Maassluis, The Netherlands
Re: Turbo Launch (Quick Start)
Johnny Ace 3000 wrote:What's happened to the quick launch (where part of the program is kept in memory so it will launch faster)??? Will it be in Firebird? Anybody know?
Quickstart is fake, it only means that it takes your puter another .... extra time during startup.
And it permanently consumes memory.
The M$ cheat to fake programs start quickly.
- asquithea
- Posts: 1533
- Joined: March 17th, 2003, 2:43 pm
- Location: Guildford, UK
The basic idea is that Firebird will get fast enough that it won't be necessary. Features like QuickLaunch just add to the download size at the end of the day. If you get a program like PowerMenu, you could probably minimise an instance of Firebird to tray, which could speed things up, since it would always be in memory. But generally I've found that a warm boot is quite fast enough (though cold booting is a bit sluggish).
I think the main barrier to a fast startup at the moment is probably XUL, given the speed of K-Meleon, but we're at least matching Opera 7.2x now, if not quicker.
I think the main barrier to a fast startup at the moment is probably XUL, given the speed of K-Meleon, but we're at least matching Opera 7.2x now, if not quicker.
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: October 24th, 2003, 3:59 pm
- Location: New Zealand
- Contact:
- peter.reisio
- Posts: 3166
- Joined: March 3rd, 2004, 6:57 pm
- Contact:
- bengoodger
- Posts: 318
- Joined: November 4th, 2002, 4:24 pm
- Location: Campbell, CA
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 2832
- Joined: April 24th, 2003, 6:00 am
- Location: UK
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 0
- Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm
-
- Posts: 1464
- Joined: October 29th, 2003, 6:19 am
- Location: Malaysia
- Contact:
I'm on a P3, and Firefox is noticeably faster to start than the Suite on both Windows and Linux. They're about the same with quick launch. Regardless, I believe we'll be better off without it. If a bloated piece of shit like Opera is fast and smooth, why can't Firefox be faster?
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050205 Firefox/1.0+
-
- Posts: 4864
- Joined: October 16th, 2003, 5:47 am
- Location: Somewhere in London, riding the Underground
bengoodger wrote:sboulema wrote:the took it out firebird, and it wont come back...
You're right. I've just now ripped out most of what was left of the turbo code that we were building - over 1,000 lines of code not executing, just taking up space... making the app slower!
Will this have any real impact, or is it just a cleanup?
Proud user of teh Fox of Fire
Registered Linux User #289618
Registered Linux User #289618
-
- Posts: 2832
- Joined: April 24th, 2003, 6:00 am
- Location: UK
- Contact:
- Nitin
- Moderator
- Posts: 3483
- Joined: February 27th, 2003, 9:38 pm
- Location: San Jose, CA
- Contact:
Yeah, firefox devs are a part of the conspiracy to make everyone upgrade their computers every two years.
Anything else?
Anything else?
If you're not using Firefox, you're not surfing the web, you're suffering it.
Join the MZ folding@home team.
Join the MZ folding@home team.