Turbo Launch (Quick Start)

Discussion of general topics about Mozilla Firefox
Johnny Ace 3000
Posts: 1
Joined: November 18th, 2003, 1:48 am

Turbo Launch (Quick Start)

Post by Johnny Ace 3000 »

What's happened to the quick launch (where part of the program is kept in memory so it will launch faster)??? Will it be in Firebird? Anybody know?
sboulema
Posts: 6615
Joined: May 20th, 2003, 12:34 am
Location: Amstelveen, The Netherlands

Post by sboulema »

the took it out firebird, and it wont come back...
User avatar
Peter(6)
Posts: 13011
Joined: September 4th, 2003, 1:26 am
Location: Maassluis, The Netherlands

Re: Turbo Launch (Quick Start)

Post by Peter(6) »

Johnny Ace 3000 wrote:What's happened to the quick launch (where part of the program is kept in memory so it will launch faster)??? Will it be in Firebird? Anybody know?


Quickstart is fake, it only means that it takes your puter another .... extra time during startup.
And it permanently consumes memory.
The M$ cheat to fake programs start quickly.
User avatar
asquithea
Posts: 1533
Joined: March 17th, 2003, 2:43 pm
Location: Guildford, UK

Post by asquithea »

The basic idea is that Firebird will get fast enough that it won't be necessary. Features like QuickLaunch just add to the download size at the end of the day. If you get a program like PowerMenu, you could probably minimise an instance of Firebird to tray, which could speed things up, since it would always be in memory. But generally I've found that a warm boot is quite fast enough (though cold booting is a bit sluggish).

I think the main barrier to a fast startup at the moment is probably XUL, given the speed of K-Meleon, but we're at least matching Opera 7.2x now, if not quicker.
metamorphosis
Posts: 24
Joined: October 24th, 2003, 3:59 pm
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Post by metamorphosis »

I disagree. Most people don't care about 150kb of missing memory, and the performance difference is very noticable. I don't think its a cheat - it makes a heckload of sense, if you use that program regularly. At least make it an option.
-m@
User avatar
peter.reisio
Posts: 3166
Joined: March 3rd, 2004, 6:57 pm
Contact:

Post by peter.reisio »

most people have 1500 program agents running down there, 1500 quicklaunch icons and 1500 desktop shortcuts

most people are idiots
User avatar
bengoodger
Posts: 318
Joined: November 4th, 2002, 4:24 pm
Location: Campbell, CA
Contact:

Post by bengoodger »

sboulema wrote:the took it out firebird, and it wont come back...


You're right. I've just now ripped out most of what was left of the turbo code that we were building - over 1,000 lines of code not executing, just taking up space... making the app slower!
mikeymike
Posts: 2832
Joined: April 24th, 2003, 6:00 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by mikeymike »

The basic idea is that Firebird will get fast enough that it won't be necessary.

Maybe on the fastest of computers. Not everyone has the fastest computers.
Lost User 15175
Posts: 0
Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm

Post by Lost User 15175 »

I like to keep my task bar at a min. The only problem I have with Fx is the cold boot as asquithea stated. Other than that, Moz Fx actually starts up faster than IE on my system (could also be cause I don't have explorer.exe opened all the time too).
johnleemk
Posts: 1464
Joined: October 29th, 2003, 6:19 am
Location: Malaysia
Contact:

Post by johnleemk »

I'm on a P3, and Firefox is noticeably faster to start than the Suite on both Windows and Linux. They're about the same with quick launch. Regardless, I believe we'll be better off without it. If a bloated piece of shit like Opera is fast and smooth, why can't Firefox be faster?
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050205 Firefox/1.0+
TheOneKEA
Posts: 4864
Joined: October 16th, 2003, 5:47 am
Location: Somewhere in London, riding the Underground

Post by TheOneKEA »

bengoodger wrote:
sboulema wrote:the took it out firebird, and it wont come back...


You're right. I've just now ripped out most of what was left of the turbo code that we were building - over 1,000 lines of code not executing, just taking up space... making the app slower!


Will this have any real impact, or is it just a cleanup?
Proud user of teh Fox of Fire
Registered Linux User #289618
mikeymike
Posts: 2832
Joined: April 24th, 2003, 6:00 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by mikeymike »

FYI: On my parents' P3-550, recent builds take ~10 seconds to load.

10 seconds of nothing to suggest (as far as the average user notices) an app is loading, but that's a whole other argument :-)
sard
Posts: 157
Joined: October 13th, 2003, 4:15 am

Post by sard »

Couldn’t agree more, but there will be no splash screen or quickload option no matter how useful they might be for people with older computers :(
User avatar
Nitin
Moderator
Posts: 3483
Joined: February 27th, 2003, 9:38 pm
Location: San Jose, CA
Contact:

Post by Nitin »

Yeah, firefox devs are a part of the conspiracy to make everyone upgrade their computers every two years.

Anything else?

:)
If you're not using Firefox, you're not surfing the web, you're suffering it.
Join the MZ folding@home team.
sard
Posts: 157
Joined: October 13th, 2003, 4:15 am

Post by sard »

I never said there was any conspiracy, just that they have no intention of implementing those 2 features, am I wrong, will they do a U turn and give us a splash screen and quickload?
Locked