Firefox Tuning
- laszlo
- Posts: 5225
- Joined: November 4th, 2002, 6:13 pm
- Location: .de
- Contact:
Put it into the user profile.
"I'll be dead after I die. I was dead before I was born. Life is a break from death." - Hlynur, 101 Reykjavík
- alanjstr
- Moderator
- Posts: 9100
- Joined: November 5th, 2002, 4:43 pm
- Location: Anywhere but here
- Contact:
Use the chromedit extension. It will put everything in the proper place.
Former UMO Admin, Former MozillaZine General Mod
I am rarely on mozillaZine, so please do not send me a private message.
My Old Firefox config files
I am rarely on mozillaZine, so please do not send me a private message.
My Old Firefox config files
-
- Posts: 319
- Joined: January 27th, 2004, 10:43 am
- BenBasson
- Moderator
- Posts: 13671
- Joined: February 13th, 2004, 5:49 am
- Location: London, UK
- Contact:
Ok, I've added in the DNS tweak. I dont think it'll make a lot of difference on my cable connection, but it could prove handy if my ISP has horrific DNS failures again. Does the setting apply to the currently stored DNS entries? (i.e. if I change the value later, will the current entries last longer, or is their expiry date set when they're first cached?)
-
- Posts: 319
- Joined: January 27th, 2004, 10:43 am
well dns performance is nothing to do with the speed of your connection, if your dns server is slow then lookups will cause a noticeable delay, if I click on a link and the dns isnt cached I get a delay while it says resolving blahblah.com, then once resolved the page loads as normal, this delay is skipped if the dns entry is cached.
The downside is if the address does change and you are running from the dns cache then you will either get a wrong page or no page at all, so for this maybe a flush dns cache option could prove useful.
I dont know if it applies to current entries or not.
The downside is if the address does change and you are running from the dns cache then you will either get a wrong page or no page at all, so for this maybe a flush dns cache option could prove useful.
I dont know if it applies to current entries or not.
-
- Posts: 2031
- Joined: February 6th, 2004, 11:59 am
hey just a comment people.... I noticed alot of users are putting this pre
as "true".... This is potentialy a big risk as it allows java to run unsigned jar files on your machine... Consider changing it back to the default "false". I've read that some functions to external programs require this setting to be true...but consider the risks.....Now i admit i don't know too much about it, consider educating me if i've made a mistake.....
check thes links for mor info
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/securit ... jssec.html
http://www.rgagnon.com/javadetails/java-0123.html
http://developer.netscape.com/docs/tech ... ectn3.html
Code: Select all
signed.applets.codebase_principal_support
check thes links for mor info
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/securit ... jssec.html
http://www.rgagnon.com/javadetails/java-0123.html
http://developer.netscape.com/docs/tech ... ectn3.html
-
- Posts: 6022
- Joined: November 25th, 2003, 8:56 am
http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap.html#milestone-schedule wrote:how you can help
C and C++ hackers: tinderbox now measures code footprint, so let's start working to reduce it rather than increase it. Resist the all-too-common tendency to add more code. Try to remove code, simplify over-complicated code, undo premature optimizations,...
Wondering if these are all considered "premature optimizations".
- laszlo
- Posts: 5225
- Joined: November 4th, 2002, 6:13 pm
- Location: .de
- Contact:
AnonEmoose wrote:hey just a comment people.... I noticed alot of users are putting this preas "true".... This is potentialy a big risk as it allows java to run unsigned jar files on your machine... Consider changing it back to the default "false". I've read that some functions to external programs require this setting to be true...but consider the risks.....Now i admit i don't know too much about it, consider educating me if i've made a mistake.....Code: Select all
signed.applets.codebase_principal_support
check thes links for mor info
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/securit ... jssec.html
http://www.rgagnon.com/javadetails/java-0123.html
http://developer.netscape.com/docs/tech ... ectn3.html
Thanks, good catch. I updated the top post to reflect this.
- MonkeeSage
- Posts: 1011
- Joined: December 20th, 2002, 8:15 pm
sasquatch wrote:http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap.html#milestone-schedule wrote:how you can help
C and C++ hackers: tinderbox now measures code footprint, so let's start working to reduce it rather than increase it. Resist the all-too-common tendency to add more code. Try to remove code, simplify over-complicated code, undo premature optimizations,...
Wondering if these are all considered "premature optimizations".
No. They are talking about "C and C++" and "tinderbox" checkins (i.e., Gecko source); not user preferences. Their point is that coders often have a tendency to add more and more new code before they have got the old code sufficiently working / simplified, which results in overly-complicated code and things breaking (or at least not working as expected). Nothing at all to do with end users setting preferences. :)
Shelumi`El
Jordan
S.D.G
-
- Posts: 6022
- Joined: November 25th, 2003, 8:56 am
MonkeeSage wrote:...
No. They are talking about "C and C++" and "tinderbox" checkins (i.e., Gecko source); not user preferences. Their point is that coders often have a tendency to add more and more new code before they have got the old code sufficiently working / simplified, which results in overly-complicated code and things breaking (or at least not working as expected). Nothing at all to do with end users setting preferences.
...
Sounds like Congress (or any legislative body, for that matter).
I don't think I've seen a politician yet who runs on the platform of what laws they will reduce or eliminate other than one in MA.
- MonkeeSage
- Posts: 1011
- Joined: December 20th, 2002, 8:15 pm
-
- Posts: 0
- Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm
I'm using the codes listed below and they have certainly made a improvement with my dialup. I have Win98SE, AMD Athlon 800 MHz, Azus K7V motherboard, 512 RAM with a Best Data Smart One 56K V.92/V.44 Internal Data/Fax Modem that connects at 42,667 bps. Firefox 0.8. I have javascript turned off, cookies off, cache at 0, load images for the originating web site only and resize images to fit window turned off.
Would anyone have any suggestions or additional settings that might be an improvement?
user_pref("content.interrupt.parsing", true);
user_pref("content.max.tokenizing.time", 3000000);
user_pref("content.maxtextrun", 8191);
user_pref("content.notify.backoffcount", 5);
user_pref("content.notify.interval", 750000);
user_pref("content.notify.ontimer", true);
user_pref("content.switch.threshold", 750000);
user_pref("network.http.max-connections", 64);
user_pref("network.http.max-connections-per-server", 8);
user_pref("network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-proxy", 8);
user_pref("network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-server", 4);
user_pref("network.http.pipelining", true);
user_pref("network.http.proxy.pipelining", true);
user_pref("network.http.pipelining.maxrequests", 96);
user_pref("nglayout.initialpaint.delay", 750);
Would anyone have any suggestions or additional settings that might be an improvement?
user_pref("content.interrupt.parsing", true);
user_pref("content.max.tokenizing.time", 3000000);
user_pref("content.maxtextrun", 8191);
user_pref("content.notify.backoffcount", 5);
user_pref("content.notify.interval", 750000);
user_pref("content.notify.ontimer", true);
user_pref("content.switch.threshold", 750000);
user_pref("network.http.max-connections", 64);
user_pref("network.http.max-connections-per-server", 8);
user_pref("network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-proxy", 8);
user_pref("network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-server", 4);
user_pref("network.http.pipelining", true);
user_pref("network.http.proxy.pipelining", true);
user_pref("network.http.pipelining.maxrequests", 96);
user_pref("nglayout.initialpaint.delay", 750);
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: February 26th, 2004, 2:15 am
instead of manual editing user.js or prefs.js, just try this automatic tool:
http://www.computerbase.de/downloads/so ... optimizer/
http://www.computerbase.de/downloads/so ... optimizer/
NAD.