Calendar for Phoenix?

MoNkaholic · Post by **MoNkaholic** » April 2nd, 2003, 5:49 pm

I think calendar would be better suited as part of minotaur, rather than a browser.

Allenz · Post by **Allenz** » April 2nd, 2003, 6:15 pm

DizzyWeb wrote:Is it just me or wouldn't a calendar be more usefull in a mail client, like Minotaur?
At least, I'd just love to have it in Minotaur... I'm using Outlook, but if I had an application that could replace the mail & calendar functionality in Outlook, i'd be thrilled

I fully agree. I have tried the Mozilla calendar, but having it integrated with the Browser was "unnatural" and have gone back to Outlook for now.

flatrabbit · Post by **flatrabbit** » April 2nd, 2003, 8:45 pm

i think that a calendar extension would be better suited to Minotaur.

Post by **old Neil Parks** » April 3rd, 2003, 11:32 am

Wouldn't a standalone calendar pgm be even better than one that integrates with a browser or a mail/news client?

Allenz · Post by **Allenz** » April 3rd, 2003, 12:47 pm

Neil Parks wrote:Wouldn't a standalone calendar pgm be even better than one that integrates with a browser or a mail/news client?

My preference would be to have the Calendar integrate with the Mail/News client. There is often a need to have both mail and a calendar open all day to track appointments and receive new mail notifications. Combining them would mean only having one application sitting in the task bar instead of two. This combination is one of the good features of Outlook.

michel v · Post by **michel v** » April 3rd, 2003, 1:19 pm

Maneo wrote:Do not need a calendar in a web browser that's really stupid ! I need a web browser and nothing else. No mail no calendar nothing !

Don't worry, no one will force you to download the possible calendar extension...

Aqua. · Post by **Aqua.** » April 3rd, 2003, 1:27 pm

My $0.02

I think Calendar should be available as a separate program.

It should also be an extensions, just like Minotaur.

michel v · Post by **michel v** » April 3rd, 2003, 4:23 pm

Aqua. wrote:It should also be an extensions, just like Minotaur.

Minotaur is not an extension.

Chris Cook · Post by **Chris Cook** » April 3rd, 2003, 6:33 pm

michel v wrote:
Aqua. wrote:It should also be an extensions, just like Minotaur.

Minotaur is not an extension.

It will be...either standalone or an extension.

jakemonO · Post by **jakemonO** » April 4th, 2003, 10:32 am

I think that calendar should be standalone, but integrateable with any (or the default) e-mail clients for sending and receiving calendar invitations. See Lotus' Organizer product for a nice demonstration of how that's done

seb · Post by **seb** » April 4th, 2003, 10:55 am

Just to let you know: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200257

Sedination · Post by **Sedination** » April 8th, 2003, 11:13 am

jakemonO wrote:I think that calendar should be standalone, but integrateable with any (or the default) e-mail clients for sending and receiving calendar invitations. See Lotus' Organizer product for a nice demonstration of how that's done

I agree, calendar should be treated as Minotaur is.

Minotaur will be available as standalone and also as an extension that can fully integrate with Phoenix.

Calendar should be available as standalone and also an extension that can fully integrate it into Minotaur.

Calendar for Phoenix?

calendar standalone

Re: calendar standalone