..towards Firefox 1.0

Discussion about official Mozilla Firefox builds
Locked
User avatar
sensemann
Posts: 755
Joined: February 6th, 2003, 12:29 pm
Location: Dresden, Germany
Contact:

..towards Firefox 1.0

Post by sensemann »

i'm a fan of statistics ;)

Image
wormeyman
Posts: 344
Joined: October 17th, 2003, 11:17 pm
Location: Somewhere starting browser wars.
Contact:

Post by wormeyman »

very cool :D
User avatar
Athropos
Posts: 238
Joined: October 17th, 2003, 11:04 am
Location: Lausanne, Switzerland
Contact:

Post by Athropos »

Interesting :)
User avatar
nooon
Posts: 254
Joined: May 15th, 2004, 4:40 pm
Location: Norway

Post by nooon »

cool
phrozenfire
Posts: 16
Joined: May 24th, 2004, 9:32 am

Post by phrozenfire »

Statistics/graphs like this would be pretty cool in Peter(6)'s daily build threads.
User avatar
sensemann
Posts: 755
Joined: February 6th, 2003, 12:29 pm
Location: Dresden, Germany
Contact:

Post by sensemann »

I'll update this every two days or so... :)
: sensemann.com :
.:: Extensions :.
.:: Themes :.
User avatar
powder
Posts: 214
Joined: November 25th, 2003, 9:50 pm

Post by powder »

Good idea.
User avatar
Moparx
Posts: 501
Joined: July 16th, 2003, 2:00 am

Post by Moparx »

definately a good idea :)
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:48.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/48.0
User avatar
sensemann
Posts: 755
Joined: February 6th, 2003, 12:29 pm
Location: Dresden, Germany
Contact:

Post by sensemann »

a week is over and I thought I'll bump this thread up with the latest graph. (if you don't see a graph up to the 22nd of June refresh the page).

Though the number of fixed bugs has passed the 100, the number of blocking bugs has increased - sad but true. :(
: sensemann.com :
.:: Extensions :.
.:: Themes :.
michaell522
Posts: 2417
Joined: November 4th, 2002, 4:47 pm
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Post by michaell522 »

I'm sure they'll remove a bunch of bugs from the blocker list - there are too many now for the time available, so some of them will have to be re-evaluated.

sensemann wrote:if you don't see a graph up to the 22nd of June

Then you're probably not seeing anything ;) I see a graph up to the 22nd of <em>July</em>
sasquatch
Posts: 6022
Joined: November 25th, 2003, 8:56 am

Post by sasquatch »

Seems to just keep climbing and climbing.
pljones
Posts: 476
Joined: December 28th, 2003, 4:13 am

Post by pljones »

So, the dotted blue line should rise slowly as people find blockers;
the red line should drop steeply as the devs fix 'em;
and the green line should be rapidly getting closer to the dotted blue line. When they meet, "it's ready".

If I was a project manager on this, I'd be running around trying to find people to blame... :lol:
sasquatch
Posts: 6022
Joined: November 25th, 2003, 8:56 am

Post by sasquatch »

Actually, all the lines just jump at some point when the developers decide they want the line to jump. This means they are moving the blocking to the next version so they can get the current one out.

A graph like this will really show how this happens.
User avatar
sensemann
Posts: 755
Joined: February 6th, 2003, 12:29 pm
Location: Dresden, Germany
Contact:

Post by sensemann »

hmm.. well .... right... 22nd of July :D

the blue line marks all bugs blocking 1.0 + the nominated ones, so once the devs go through the nominations once again the red line will rise even more until it meets the blue one on its way down ;)

i really hope we won't see too much blockers moved to the next milestone... but i guess we will like with every release. anyway, there are also a bunch of meta bugs like "reduce filesize" that will be moved with every milestone and work just as a reminder.
RichCorb
Posts: 79
Joined: June 30th, 2004, 1:13 am

Post by RichCorb »

sensemann, thanks for doing this, it's pretty sweet to have a visual guide to blocker progress.
Locked