MozillaZine

Fx 1.0.3 testing

Discussion about official Mozilla Firefox builds
Quarantine

User avatar
 
Posts: 8516
Joined: November 5th, 2004, 11:28 am
April 2nd, 2005, 2:04 pm

Post Posted April 2nd, 2005, 2:04 pm

Asa Dotzler has asked for assistance in testing Fx 1.0.3

A search of bugzilla shows a small number of bug fixes. As for any security updates, as with previous releases we will probably have to wait until it is released for confirmation of the fixes.

Added: Asa's blogs so far for Firefox 1.0.3 - it is best to add comments about any problems to the latest of Asa's blogs.
April 2 firefox 1.0 update candidates available for testing
April 3 second candidates for firefox 1.0.3
April 4 1.0.3 candidate testing
April 5 AM 1.0.3 final candidates
April 5 PM another shot at 1.0.3
April 6 yet another 1.0.3 candidate :-)
April 8 1.0.3 candidates
April 13 updating your extensions for 1.0.3
April 14 firefox 1.0.3 testing candidates
April 15 firefox 1.0.3 and mozilla 1.7.7 released
Last edited by Quarantine on April 16th, 2005, 1:54 am, edited 5 times in total.

anaran

User avatar
 
Posts: 1
Joined: April 5th, 2005, 2:03 pm
Location: Munich, Germany
April 5th, 2005, 2:16 pm

Post Posted April 5th, 2005, 2:16 pm

Fx 1.0.3 PR works fine except for a 80-90 %CPU condition after resuming from hibernation at work.
SwitchProxy to my workplace proxy did not get Fx out of the high CPU usage.
Had to restart Fx.

I can confirm that installation on Windows XP (tested on two separate sytems with SP2) removes installation information of previous 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 installation from Add/Remove Programs and now only shows 1.0.3 installation available for uninstall.

On a system with 1.0 PR installed, that entry did not get removed by 1.0.3 PR installation.
Serious registry searching for "1.0PR" and key deletion was required to finally get rid of the 1.0PR uninstall information.

And 1.0.3 PR even still works :-)
Last edited by anaran on April 7th, 2005, 1:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

polidobj

User avatar
 
Posts: 2962
Joined: March 31st, 2004, 9:10 am
Location: Maryland USA - im in ur tinderbox, crashtesting ur firefox
April 5th, 2005, 6:52 pm

Post Posted April 5th, 2005, 6:52 pm

1.0.3 still needs work:

Asa wrote:After further consideration (and investigation,) we have decided that it may be necessary to take a rather larger change into 1.0.3 than we had planned. We've run into one of those "fix the root cause or patch around the symptoms" trade-offs and to prevent future security issues, we're leaning towards the "fix the root problem" fix.

The problem with "the right fix" is that it will probably break a number of extensions - we've already determined that features within DOM Inspector will break and need to be patched.


http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/asa/archives/007898.html
Brian J Polidoro - Today's bugs brought to you by Raid. :P
Windows NT 5.1 & Testing Win7

subferno
 
Posts: 282
Joined: June 9th, 2003, 5:35 pm
April 5th, 2005, 10:14 pm

Post Posted April 5th, 2005, 10:14 pm

I dont want to sound like those annoying people who always ask for release dates, but today is when I just heard about 1.0.3.

How long has this candidate build been in development and when is its projected release date?

Again, I dont want to sound like a PITA, I just noticed this.
Firefox 3
Win XP Pro SP3
AMD64 3000+ Gigabyte x800 1.5 gig RAM

Bazzi
 
Posts: 51
Joined: April 2nd, 2005, 2:33 pm
Location: Germany
April 6th, 2005, 1:22 am

Post Posted April 6th, 2005, 1:22 am

It's in development since 1.0.2 and it will be done when it's done.

Da Dude
 
Posts: 33
Joined: November 13th, 2004, 5:37 pm
Location: Behind a glowing thing i like to call a monitor
April 6th, 2005, 2:10 pm

Post Posted April 6th, 2005, 2:10 pm

Is it me or are quicktime vids/trailers on apple.com broken?

using the latest alternative quicktime and
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050405 Firefox/1.0.3

Simpsongo
 
Posts: 96
Joined: March 10th, 2004, 11:41 pm
April 6th, 2005, 8:35 pm

Post Posted April 6th, 2005, 8:35 pm

I just tested it with War of the Worlds. All seems to be working fine for me.

I do use regular Quicktime though.

imperialfrost
 
Posts: 4
Joined: April 7th, 2005, 3:18 am
April 7th, 2005, 3:20 am

Post Posted April 7th, 2005, 3:20 am

for me flash is broken on http://mlb.com
with the version yesterday everything was just working fine.

Queek
 
Posts: 18
Joined: March 9th, 2005, 5:01 am
April 7th, 2005, 3:25 am

Post Posted April 7th, 2005, 3:25 am

This is broken for me, but works in 1.0.2
http://www.mikeindustries.com/blog/files/sifr/2.0/

Can someone confirm (might be another Flash issue)?

tongle
 
Posts: 670
Joined: March 13th, 2004, 3:15 pm
April 7th, 2005, 4:42 am

Post Posted April 7th, 2005, 4:42 am

This isn't the right way to be updating firefox security. The correct way should be to just release simple patches to update it (as was done with .9.2->.9.3, or whichever had that shell:// exploit), not to have an entire new build downloaded through the auto-updater and risk with the installation errors that occur so often.
<b><a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/f1254114/petition.html">Sign this petition if you want to help spread Firefox</a></b>

parsec
 
Posts: 160
Joined: October 22nd, 2003, 7:05 am
Location: USA alas
April 7th, 2005, 5:18 am

Post Posted April 7th, 2005, 5:18 am

Queek wrote:This is broken for me, but works in 1.0.2
http://www.mikeindustries.com/blog/files/sifr/2.0/

Can someone confirm (might be another Flash issue)?


WFM in 1.0.3

imperialfrost
 
Posts: 4
Joined: April 7th, 2005, 3:18 am
April 7th, 2005, 5:43 am

Post Posted April 7th, 2005, 5:43 am

Queek wrote:This is broken for me, but works in 1.0.2
http://www.mikeindustries.com/blog/files/sifr/2.0/

Can someone confirm (might be another Flash issue)?



this also broken for me. did a complete clean install and it doesnt work.

GrailKnight

User avatar
 
Posts: 2349
Joined: January 5th, 2004, 5:40 am
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
April 7th, 2005, 8:13 am

Post Posted April 7th, 2005, 8:13 am

WFM with the latest 1.0.3 win32 zip 20050407 build.
"There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact". - Sherlock Holmes

michaell
 
Posts: 1870
Joined: November 4th, 2002, 4:47 pm
Location: London, UK
April 7th, 2005, 9:22 am

Post Posted April 7th, 2005, 9:22 am

tongle wrote:This isn't the right way to be updating firefox security. The correct way should be to just release simple patches to update it (as was done with .9.2->.9.3, or whichever had that shell:// exploit), not to have an entire new build downloaded through the auto-updater and risk with the installation errors that occur so often.

That update broke the auto-updating for some people that used it. It is the plan to be able to have XPIs of particular chunks of the browser, rather than having the whole installer, but it doesn't work yet. It should work in 1.1, so that 1.1.x updates will be less painful.

doh
 
Posts: 237
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 12:38 pm
April 7th, 2005, 9:44 am

Post Posted April 7th, 2005, 9:44 am

Using the latest 1.0.3 build w/ the following extensions:

Toolbar Enhancements
Allow Right-Click
Statusbar Clock
Disable Targets For Downloads
FirefoxView
ieview
Nuke Anything
Print It!
SearchThis
Adblock
FlashGot
Extended Statusbar
Hotmail Tabs
text/plain
Tabbrowser Extensions
MediaPlayerConnectivity
ForecastFox
Compact Menu

Also using the "Mostly Crystal" theme.

No problems to report so far.

Return to Firefox Builds


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests