FF allowing downloads from infected Websites
13 posts • Page 1 of 1
August 26th, 2005, 7:40 am
I'm using Firefox 1.0.6 on a fully patched XP box with the "Allow Websites to install software" box unchecked. Two days ago a file "asdf.exe" was deposited at root (c:\asdf.exe) and immediately tried to access the Internet. Presumably asdf.exe was trying to install something malevolent. Research on the Web indicates this file has been delivered from a number of Web sites, most likely by an infected ad server. I know this came in through Firefox as I had nothing else running at the time. A variant of the cross scriping vulnerability?
-dave
August 26th, 2005, 8:33 am
Are you sure firefox automatically downloaded and executed this file and didn't piggy back on another executable you downloaded? Do you have a website that we can test this vunribility?
I'm moving to Theory, everything works there.
Most issues are solved by going through the Standard Diagnostic
August 26th, 2005, 8:41 am
That would be my first guess also and the file has been known to be distributed through e-mail - the exploit that is.
Security Bulletin
August 26th, 2005, 8:51 am
Checked my download logs for Firefox; nothing listed (confirming my memory that I wasn't downloading anything). Also, wasn't running email or Instant Messenger at the time. Let me reiterate: I didn't click on an ad, and didn't try to download a file from this Website.
I know that Onion users have been noticing the download, but it's intermittent, which suggests that it's coming from a rotating ad server; some ads deliver a payload and some do not. http://www.theonion.com
August 26th, 2005, 9:52 am
Also, see this thread
http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark, ... ~mode=flat The thread concludes that this exploit *only* affects Firefox, but is unsure whether it will only be successful on older versions. I can confirm that the exploit works in 1.0.6 as well. -dave
August 26th, 2005, 9:56 am
So how come you think it was downloaded through Firefox?
This is a known exploit that there is several different exploits out there for. Just asking.
August 30th, 2005, 6:04 am
I think this could be an issue with prefetch in Mozilla/Firefox. Prefetch is turned on by default in Mozilla/Firefox. Basically, anything marked with a prefetched tag is brought down, and anybody can mark anything with a prefetch tag. To turn prefetching off, go to the address bar and type "about:config" and then scroll down to "network.prefetch-next". Double click on it to change the setting to False.
August 30th, 2005, 6:07 am
For this and other reasions, prefetch is a bad feature.... it also leads to more traffic. But today's connections are so fast that this feature isn't needed anymore. It should be removed.
Greets, Andreas
My german energy-saving page - let's stop wasting of energy!
August 30th, 2005, 3:31 pm
Well, if you can find a means for Firefox to do so, there is a substantial reward for finding such security flaws. Of course, you will have to convince someone. In my opinion, finding a file on your computer and asserting that it came from Firefox is not convincing, but if you can provide the evidence, the bounty is yours.
Your link on dlsreports is down.
September 1st, 2005, 2:03 am
What version of Java are you using? (You can check with http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/~tomw/version.html or about:plugins.)
Why do you think this security hole involves prefetch? Prefetch is just about getting things into the cache, not interpreting or executing them. <a href="http://www.squarefree.com/burningedge/">The Burning Edge</a>, <a href="http://www.squarefree.com/bookmarklets/">Bookmarklets</a>, <a href="http://www.squarefree.com/">My personal blog</a>
September 1st, 2005, 2:50 am
Prefect download things to the cache. Nothing wrong with that since nothing is executed.
September 1st, 2005, 3:07 am
Unable to reproduce on Firefox 1.0.6 with a dozen reloads and Java/Flash/JavaScript enabled. I agree with AnotherGuest, if you can provide some tangible evidence, do so and claim your $500.
September 1st, 2005, 6:56 am
The ad that the file came from is no longer on the site.
Gruntled was using an outdated, vulnerable version of Java. Java, not Fx, was apparently the problem. Thanks for reporting that, Gruntled. It is a good reminder to update Java or disable it.
13 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests |
|