MozillaZine


[MozJF] trunk 7zip win32 thread

Discussion about official Mozilla Firefox builds
MozJF
 
Posts: 2007
Joined: July 14th, 2003, 10:07 am
Location: Near Atlantic Ocean

Post Posted January 6th, 2004, 3:45 am

Hello.

Maybe it will be simpler to make a sticky thread ? :)

Trunk sources up to date at midnight mozilla.org time.

For Pentium Pro/2/3/4, Celeron and AMD Athlon/Duron/AthlonXP CPUs

It is a 7zip file, as installer doesn't care about help.jar file.

* 7Zip : 5 Mb file

http://pryan.org/firebird/mozjf/

Good download, and remember : if it breaks your computer, don't shoot me, I am only a contributor.
MozJF

frease

User avatar
 
Posts: 3981
Joined: September 16th, 2003, 1:17 pm

Post Posted January 6th, 2004, 5:30 am

Thanks, works fine so far :)

bcool

User avatar
 
Posts: 638
Joined: December 27th, 2003, 9:01 am
Location: Ozarks

Post Posted January 6th, 2004, 11:41 am

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040106 Firebird/0.7+ (MozJF)


sweet so far! My first trunk build ever. what a pleasant surprise. Thanks.
Never let them see you sweat

d_g

User avatar
 
Posts: 519
Joined: July 24th, 2003, 3:50 pm

Post Posted January 6th, 2004, 12:34 pm

Quick question Moz - apart from the 7zip compression, how do your builds differ from 'officials'?

ByTor201
 
Posts: 573
Joined: November 26th, 2003, 10:36 am
Location: 40:53:21N 74:02:46W

Post Posted January 6th, 2004, 4:46 pm

This time, I just installed over yesterday's build with no problems. I didn't want to go through that Flash problem again. So far, it's running fine. :)

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040106 Firebird/0.7+ (MozJF)

MozJF
 
Posts: 2007
Joined: July 14th, 2003, 10:07 am
Location: Near Atlantic Ocean

Post Posted January 7th, 2004, 12:52 am

dangrey wrote:Quick question Moz - apart from the 7zip compression, how do your builds differ from 'officials'?


They're -O1 -G6 optimized (For Pentium Pro/2/3/4, Celeron and AMD Athlon/Duron/AthlonXP CPUs ), and based on source code up to date at midnight mozilla.org time :)

And also, slightky smaller than zip official one ;)
MozJF

MozJF
 
Posts: 2007
Joined: July 14th, 2003, 10:07 am
Location: Near Atlantic Ocean

Post Posted January 7th, 2004, 4:26 am

7 january 2004 build is online.
MozJF

johnleemk
 
Posts: 1464
Joined: October 29th, 2003, 6:19 am
Location: Malaysia

Post Posted January 7th, 2004, 5:04 am

This time, I just installed over yesterday's build with no problems. I didn't want to go through that Flash problem again. So far, it's running fine.

Not recommended if you're using 7zip or a zip file. Only the installer can safely do that.
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20050205 Firefox/1.0+

hussam
 
Posts: 616
Joined: August 22nd, 2003, 11:49 am

Post Posted January 7th, 2004, 12:56 pm

MozJF wrote:Maybe it will be simpler to make a sticky thread ? :)


That's true. It's better than having to start a new thread everyday.
One question, what are regchrome.exe regxpcom.exe used for?

bcool

User avatar
 
Posts: 638
Joined: December 27th, 2003, 9:01 am
Location: Ozarks

Post Posted January 7th, 2004, 1:46 pm

MozJF wrote:
dangrey wrote:Quick question Moz - apart from the 7zip compression, how do your builds differ from 'officials'?


They're -O1 -G6 optimized (For Pentium Pro/2/3/4, Celeron and AMD Athlon/Duron/AthlonXP CPUs ), and based on source code up to date at midnight mozilla.org time :)

And also, slightky smaller than zip official one ;)



I'm embarrassed to say that I don't know what "-01 -G6 optimized" means but whatever it means, it sure likes my machine. WINXP SP1 H.E. on Intel Pentium III 1000 Sweet! :)
Never let them see you sweat

ByTor201
 
Posts: 573
Joined: November 26th, 2003, 10:36 am
Location: 40:53:21N 74:02:46W

Post Posted January 7th, 2004, 1:48 pm

johnleemk wrote:
This time, I just installed over yesterday's build with no problems. I didn't want to go through that Flash problem again. So far, it's running fine.

Not recommended if you're using 7zip or a zip file. Only the installer can safely do that.
I did so knowingly. But, everything seems to be running fine here. I see that bug 206029 is reopened, so I figured as long as I'm overwriting the same contributor's build I should be alright.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040107 Firebird/0.7+ (MozJF)

MozJF
 
Posts: 2007
Joined: July 14th, 2003, 10:07 am
Location: Near Atlantic Ocean

Post Posted January 7th, 2004, 1:48 pm

It says that the code is made specially for For Pentium Pro/2/3/4, Celeron and AMD Athlon/Duron/AthlonXP CPUs.
MozJF

MozJF
 
Posts: 2007
Joined: July 14th, 2003, 10:07 am
Location: Near Atlantic Ocean

Post Posted January 8th, 2004, 5:22 am

08 january build is available.

It is now known as 0.8.0+ instead of 0.7+ :)

My useragent under winXP :

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040108 Firebird/0.8.0+ (MozJF)

5.03 Mb 7zip file
MozJF

doh
 
Posts: 238
Joined: January 29th, 2003, 12:38 pm

Post Posted January 8th, 2004, 5:25 am

Thanks MozJF. Your builds are alse nice & fast. Downloaded at 200KB/s.

frease

User avatar
 
Posts: 3981
Joined: September 16th, 2003, 1:17 pm

Post Posted January 8th, 2004, 6:05 am

Hi, using Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040108 Firebird/0.7+ StumbleUpon/1.899 (MozJF) now.

For the close button (X) on the tab bar, I got this:

<img src="http://server5.uploadit.org/files2/080104-x.png">

I am using the default theme.

Return to Firefox Builds


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests