The Official Win32 20060815 [Branch] build is out.

Discussion about official Mozilla Firefox builds
User avatar
Elder Young
Posts: 545
Joined: June 9th, 2004, 8:24 pm

Post by Elder Young »

Can someone with Adblock Plus installed see if they crash/hang while visiting http://audiorevolution.com/ ? This site always gives me trouble, but disabling Adblock Plus seems to make it go away.
System: Core 2 Quad Q9650, 8GB RAM, Sapphire 5870 Toxic, Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit, Flash 10.1.53.64, Java 1.6U21 B04
alimadzi
Posts: 48
Joined: January 25th, 2005, 8:49 am
Location: Port Orchard, WA, USA
Contact:

Post by alimadzi »

bsr5 wrote:Will the branch end at 2.0? Then the trunk branch out before 3.0?

The short answers are NO and YES.

What we call the 2.0 branch will continue to be maintained for the purpose of issuing security updates after the official 2.0 release. The recent 1.5.0.6 security update came from the still-active 1.5 branch. The 1.0 branch, on the other hand, has ended because MoCo does not plan to issue any more updates beyond 1.0.8.

As far as the trunk branching out before 3.0, that WILL happen at some point. I think as many branch-only fixes/changes as possible are merged onto the trunk first in order to cut down on duplicated effort and synchronization headaches. Then a new branch for 3.0 will be cut so that development on Firefox 4.0 can begin on the trunk.

Anyone with more knowledge of this process (probably many of you) is welcome to clarify or correct what I've said, but I think I've got the gist of it. Hope that helps...
User avatar
XerBlade
Posts: 865
Joined: October 4th, 2005, 10:45 pm
Location: Nashville, TN, US

Post by XerBlade »

bsr5 wrote:Will the branch end at 2.0? Then the trunk branch out before 3.0?

It's the 2.0 branch, so this particular branch will go to 2.0 and its stability updates (the ones with small bugfixes and security patches, like with how 1.0.1 etc. and 1.5.0.1 etc. have been for the 1.0 and 1.5 branches). The next branch is slated to be 3.0, from trunk, where branches... branch from, while trunk still continues onward to future versions.

Edit: Ah, beat me to it, sort of....
User Agent
Extensions
AMD64/2.41GHz RAM/1.0GB ATI/256MB-GDDR3/128-bit/8xAGP Cable6.0M/384kbps
pal-moz
Posts: 5937
Joined: September 23rd, 2005, 5:40 pm
Location: Tokyo , Japan

Post by pal-moz »

alimadzi wrote:
bsr5 wrote:Will the branch end at 2.0? Then the trunk branch out before 3.0?

The short answers are NO and YES.
What we call the 2.0 branch will continue to be maintained for the purpose of issuing security updates after the official 2.0 release. The recent 1.5.0.6 security update came from the still-active 1.5 branch. The 1.0 branch, on the other hand, has ended because MoCo does not plan to issue any more updates beyond 1.0.8.
As far as the trunk branching out before 3.0, that WILL happen at some point. I think as many branch-only fixes/changes as possible are merged onto the trunk first in order to cut down on duplicated effort and synchronization headaches. Then a new branch for 3.0 will be cut so that development on Firefox 4.0 can begin on the trunk.
Anyone with more knowledge of this process (probably many of you) is welcome to clarify or correct what I've said, but I think I've got the gist of it. Hope that helps...

http://wiki.mozilla.org/ReleaseRoadmap
Warduke
Posts: 630
Joined: November 4th, 2002, 7:49 pm

Post by Warduke »

Elder Young wrote:Can someone with Adblock Plus installed see if they crash/hang while visiting http://audiorevolution.com/ ? This site always gives me trouble, but disabling Adblock Plus seems to make it go away.


Confirmed. With Adblock Plus enabled, it crashed, and with it disabled, it was fine.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1b1) Gecko/20060814 BonEcho/2.0b1 ID:2006081403
Firefox : One Browser to Rule Them All.
User avatar
Elder Young
Posts: 545
Joined: June 9th, 2004, 8:24 pm

Post by Elder Young »

Warduke wrote:
Elder Young wrote:Can someone with Adblock Plus installed see if they crash/hang while visiting http://audiorevolution.com/ ? This site always gives me trouble, but disabling Adblock Plus seems to make it go away.


Confirmed. With Adblock Plus enabled, it crashed, and with it disabled, it was fine.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1b1) Gecko/20060814 BonEcho/2.0b1 ID:2006081403


Thanks for confirming. I filed <A HREF="https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348688">Bug 348688</A>. If you have a talkback ID, feel free to add it to the bug report.
System: Core 2 Quad Q9650, 8GB RAM, Sapphire 5870 Toxic, Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit, Flash 10.1.53.64, Java 1.6U21 B04
User avatar
BenneJezzerette
Posts: 1482
Joined: November 1st, 2004, 1:47 am
Location: Ghost in the Machine

Post by BenneJezzerette »

http://talkback-public.mozilla.org/sear ... B22102364G

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1b1) Gecko/20060814 BonEcho/2.0b1 ID:2006081403


Minor Crash
Vista Home Premium 64 AMD 9950 Quad Core + 8GB DDR2 1066 1x500GB 1X750GB Partitioned 1X1TB MSI GTX260 896
Firefox Safe Browsing - Pocomail Safe E-Mail from Script Kitties
True Internet Surfing + E-Mail not Junk
mw22
Posts: 2379
Joined: November 19th, 2002, 5:37 pm

Post by mw22 »

BenneJezzerette wrote:Minor Crash

Minor Crash?
What do you mean?
How can a crash be minor?
User avatar
scorpiosoft
Posts: 11
Joined: August 8th, 2006, 6:36 am
Location: The LowLands

Post by scorpiosoft »

Elder Young wrote:Can someone with Adblock Plus installed see if they crash/hang while visiting http://audiorevolution.com/ ? This site always gives me trouble, but disabling Adblock Plus seems to make it go away.

No problems overhere with the mentioned page and Adblock Plus 0.7.1.1 is active when visiting the page.

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1b1) Gecko/20060814 BonEcho/2.0b1
Foxicated
Posts: 23
Joined: February 1st, 2006, 10:11 am

Post by Foxicated »

Elder Young wrote:Can someone with Adblock Plus installed see if they crash/hang while visiting http://audiorevolution.com/ ? This site always gives me trouble, but disabling Adblock Plus seems to make it go away.

Crash with yesterday's build.
Hangs with current build ( Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1b1) Gecko/20060814 BonEcho/2.0b1)
Adblock 0.7.1.1
Stebs
Posts: 515
Joined: June 3rd, 2004, 5:49 am
Location: EU

Post by Stebs »

Stebs wrote:
pgreco wrote:About new theme, can anyone click on back and forward button's dropdown, even with buttons disabled?
Is there a bug for it?
Yes, if I remember correctly, there is. Don't know Bug# though. Perhaps try to search the Forum, I think someone asked about it before.
Found it:
#348319[Firefox:Toolbars]-Some inactive toolbar buttons are highlighted on mouse click [Win]
User avatar
hhh
Posts: 6731
Joined: February 29th, 2004, 11:21 am
Location: Stuart, FL

Post by hhh »

Uncle Spellbinder wrote:Just a guess, but with so many changes happening with the new default theme, I'm betting that many themes will be "broken" until the new Default theme is officially finished so themers won't have to play catch-up with all the changes.

I'm not sure about other themers, but the new Search bar/ URL bars especially are giving me problems. There have been some loud grumblings in the Themes thread:P

Jus wrote:Heh, the search bar looks really weird for me.

Image


That's because you've changed your text size. The field expands to fit the text, but the other buttons don't. I believe this is edhume's #1 beef with the latest changes.

UNOwen wrote:I'm seeing something odd when trying to set a new desktop wallpaper.

WFM.


"Recently Closed Tabs" is working only sporadically, greyed out most of the time. Anyone else?

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1b1) Gecko/20060814 BonEcho/2.0b1
supernova_00
Posts: 4832
Joined: June 24th, 2004, 8:03 pm
Location: Maryland, USA

Post by supernova_00 »

^hhh that happend to me when I still had the old prefs set to enable session restore.
chob
Posts: 4283
Joined: May 17th, 2003, 12:05 pm
Location: London, UK

Post by chob »

This thread is closed, please use the next one
Locked