Official Win32 2004-01-20 trunk out

Discussion about official Mozilla Firefox builds
OpA
Posts: 58
Joined: November 19th, 2002, 10:19 am
Contact:

Official Win32 2004-01-20 trunk out

Post by OpA »

wmf



Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040120 Firebird/0.8.0+
naughty by nature
rob08
Posts: 165
Joined: November 21st, 2002, 5:18 am
Location: Bronx, Sweden
Contact:

Post by rob08 »

i downloaded the 04-01-21 trunk, and it works pretty good. gonna test it some more though
snyggve
User avatar
peaveyman
Posts: 341
Joined: June 1st, 2003, 6:24 pm

Post by peaveyman »

sboulema
Posts: 6615
Joined: May 20th, 2003, 12:34 am
Location: Amstelveen, The Netherlands

Post by sboulema »

works for me :)
User avatar
ogryn
Posts: 132
Joined: September 11th, 2003, 10:03 am
Location: Hampshire, UK
Contact:

Post by ogryn »

When I open a site using the drop-down box picker thing, it opens in a new tab, instead of the current one. Is this intensional?

The only extension I have is WebDev

It also crashed a few times when trying to apply the BlueMonkey 0.8 theme, but now its on, I haven't had a crash since.
User avatar
Jeff_pony
Moderator
Posts: 8790
Joined: January 5th, 2003, 12:38 pm
Location: (.uk)
Contact:

Post by Jeff_pony »

When I start it on win 2000 it asks for : msvcr71.dll

I have got it from sourceforge and now everything works ok. It has something to do with .Net ...?
Please PM the mod team when you see a rule infraction
Life State:: McLovin it
Camino v2.1 (pre)
aebrahim
Posts: 1234
Joined: November 10th, 2002, 2:47 am
Location: Hong Kong
Contact:

Post by aebrahim »

Jeff_pony wrote:When I start it on win 2000 it asks for : msvcr71.dll

I have got it from sourceforge and now everything works ok. It has something to do with .Net ...?

It works fine for me on Windows XP. Given that the official build is compiled with MSVC 6.0, it should not require any .NET DLLs. I have no idea why you're seeing this behaviour. :?
User avatar
Toxikk
Posts: 159
Joined: December 1st, 2002, 1:24 pm

Post by Toxikk »

wfm so far on osx. nice build.
Old Bozz
Posts: 0
Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm

Post by Old Bozz »

Working fine here. Thanks for the zip. :wink:
User avatar
sdstern
Posts: 20
Joined: December 29th, 2003, 9:27 am

Post by sdstern »

Installed from Zip. Working OK. Lost the Google toolbar.
j-gray
Posts: 62
Joined: April 11th, 2003, 4:34 pm

msvcr71.dll error

Post by j-gray »

Jeff_pony wrote:When I start it on win 2000 it asks for : msvcr71.dll

I have got it from sourceforge and now everything works ok. It has something to do with .Net ...?


I got that same error when I first launched build 'Gecko/20040114 Firebird/0.7+'. It only happened the first time and never appeared again. This was on Win2K w/sp3. Haven't seen the error again and it was a clean install.
User avatar
steeef
Posts: 91
Joined: May 7th, 2003, 5:54 pm

Post by steeef »

Can someone confirm whether search plugins are still broken?

I tried installing this build fresh (no previous install, no previous profiles) on Windows XP. The default Google search plugin shows up initially, and I can add searches from mycroft.mozdev.org fine. However, when I close and restart Firebird, none of the plugins show up, including Google. On a different XP machine, I had previously installed the newest build over a branch build, and none of my existing search plugins ever showed up afterwards. I tried searching Bugzilla and found nothing on this bug. I haven't been able to use the search bar since the first branch build of the year (01/14 I believe).

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040120 Firebird/0.8.0+
User avatar
mmcguigan
Posts: 30
Joined: September 19th, 2003, 9:05 pm
Contact:

Post by mmcguigan »

I've not tried a build from the 20th yet, but as the source code that created the search-plugin problem has not changed, I suspect the problem still exists.

http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=231203

Update: Still broken in Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040121 Firebird/0.8.0+
Last edited by mmcguigan on January 21st, 2004, 6:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Sammo
Posts: 294
Joined: November 25th, 2002, 7:36 pm
Location: Oregon

Post by Sammo »

This build works just fine so far.
- Sammo -
old Harry Waldron
Moderator
Posts: 0
Joined: December 31st, 1969, 5:00 pm

Post by old Harry Waldron »

Now that I'm in the right section and got my Trunk/Branch definitions straight ... The 0.8+ Trunk is working well for W/98, 2000 SP4, XP SP2 (beta), and W/2003 on a mixture of the 01-20 and 01-21 Zip Builds :)
Post Reply