NicFord1 wrote:When I visit Google Docs & Spreadsheets none of my documents open.
Have you got Google Toolbar or any other Google extension?
[ext] NoScript 1.1.4.5 - faster and neater
Have you got Google Toolbar or any other Google extension?
Firefox extensions? I have Google Bookmarks Button and GooglePreview, but neither are official Google extensions. I also run Google Talk. If any of that helps...
OK, could you please give a try to this beta development version? http://software.informaction.com/getit#devel Also, double check that every domain listed in the NoScript menu (including about:blank) is allowed for the relevant Google pages. Good luck and let me know. Last edited by Giorgio Maone on January 27th, 2007, 4:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
That works! Installing the beta version fixed the problem, Google Docs now functions as it should... Thank you!
FireFox 2.0.1 (for OS X) crashes at www.firstbankmo.com/ after NoScript is 'instructed to accept the script at this URL.
phule123
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.6) Gecko/2010041 BetterPrivacy-1.47 Firefox/3.6.3 OS X 10.6.3
Thanks for a great extension, Giorgio!
I just noticed that the following set-up breaks with the NoScript extension: <script> <blah> </script><noscript> Sorry, JavaScript is disabled. </noscript> According to http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/scripts.html it would be reasonable to render the noscript content if we're blocking the script portion. The reason this concerns me is because a tracking counter I use has an image-based fallback for the cases when scripting is disabled. They use 'noscript', and don't allow changing the code (besides, the stats will probably break if I do).
Well, Debian upgraded me to Seamonkey 1.0.7, and my noscript extension is preventing the bookmark menu from working. Any ETA on compatablity with 1.0.7?
@phule123: I'm investigating, but the most likely culprit the Java scrolling applet on the top.
@lesha: If, as I guess, the <script> is from a different domain than the page, that behaviour is not broken but rather the normal one. The <noscript> tag is not tied to the nearest <script> tag, it's just rendered (with no regard for its position) when JS is disabled on the page (i.e. for the top domain). That said, your observation is interesting. I could try modify the standard <noscript> behaviour so that this element behaves as you expect, so that a special alternate content can be shown for every 3rd party JavaScript file which is blocked. Definitely in my TODO list 
@evilmrhenry: just reinstall NoScript as root, as explained in FAQ 3.6
@Giorgio: Thanks for your reply!
Aha, you're right: if I block the page's host, then <noscript> is indeed rendered; sorry, I didn't think to check that
And, you're also right in that the syntax, unfortunately, does not tie <noscript> tags to <script> tags. W3C is kind of vague on the subject, but I think that our interpretation: Render a <noscript> if the immediately preceding tag is a blocked <script> tag. is fine according to them. I also saw this page which seems to think along the same lines: http://www.deeptrawl.com/help/find_Miss ... t_Tags.htm I don't have any hard data to back it up, but I think this is one of the major ways people use the tag: <script></script><noscript></noscript> Anyway, best of luck fixing it
Just one small question
When you check "Scripts Globally Allowed (dangerous)", is that means you disable NoScript? Or is there still some NoScript functions running?
It's almost identical to disabling NoScript. The only relevant difference is that if you granted extra permissions to trusted sites (NoScript Options|Advanced) they still apply. If you disable or uninstall NoScript they get revoked, instead.
Please allow NS to disable/enable with a center click on the icon in the taskbar <b> without </b> having to click on a warning.
Last edited by Alfred Neuman on January 22nd, 2007, 11:16 am, edited 2 times in total.
Do you often feel that you must be from another planet, or wish you were?
Your extension is much appreciated!
I notice quite frequently that my NS's allow/don't allow settings in the status bar don't stick for a particular site(s) and I later have to redo them when I visit that site again. Has something become corrupted or is this normal when NS is updated to a newer version? I've turned NS updating off, thinking this might be the cause. My current NS is v1.1.4.5.061206 My FF is v2.0.0.1 Thank you ~ John
Hoping it would be easier to manage the lists (black or white) by including info such as last visit date, and being able to restore defaults when items such as about:blank is deleted accidentally...
Or it really doesn't matter (having long list with a good number of sites visited once or twice), and should be left as is?
Hi,
Can someone please tell me how to delete noscript thanks points Return to Extension/Theme Releases Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: Gavin77, MSN [Bot] and 2 guests |
|
