Seamonkey 1.1.10
45 posts • Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
April 19th, 2008, 3:07 pm
I've seen a few things reference 1.1.10, but what is the status of 1.1.10?
i.e http://www.mozilla.org/security/announc ... 08-20.html
April 19th, 2008, 9:23 pm
Should come soon. As far as I can tell, that's the only security/stability bug for this update, to fix an issue introduced in the most recent round. To get Firefox 2.0.0.14 out, Thunderbird 2.0.0.13 was put on hold (.14 will be released instead). SM 1.1.10 would shadow FF 2.0.0.14, but KaiRo is on his well-deserved vacation, so maybe this is the reason that we don't see release candidates yet...
April 27th, 2008, 9:08 pm
Thanks much for the info. I look forward to the release of the bugfix for my favorite suite.
April 30th, 2008, 6:32 pm
According to the information on KaiRo's blog, SeaMonkey 1.1.10 will "shadow" the Firefox 2.0.0.15 release. The bug for MFSA 2008-20 doesn't seem severe enough to justify the effort for another SeaMonkey release at this time.
May 1st, 2008, 11:10 am
LOL, I replied without looking, & now see rsx11m had it covered.
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 SeaMonkey/2.0 Pinball Refspoof CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
BANK OF AMERICA.COM ONLINE BANKING SUCKS IN THE HUGEST WAY IMAGINABLE
May 7th, 2008, 9:46 am
FYI: If you are running Linux and don't want to wait until June, check your distribution's repositories. For example, the openSUSE build service provides RPM's for SeaMonkey 1.1.9 with Gecko 1.8.1.14, thus containing the fix for MSFA 2008-20.
June 20th, 2008, 12:24 pm
Well, it does look like we "may" need this interim release sooner rather than later; depending of course on whether or not a FF 2/3 bug also impacts Seamonkey.
"According to a note from TippingPoint’s Zero Day Initiative (ZDI) , a company that buys exclusive rights to software vulnerability data, the Firefox 3.0 bug also affects earlier versions of Firefox 2.0x." http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=1288&tag=nl.e622 N
XP PRO SP3, Comodo3, Anti-Vir Free, MalwareBytes, Panda Anti-RootKit
June 20th, 2008, 12:54 pm
As far as I know, 1.1.10 should come around the Firefox 2.0.0.15 release, the latter on track for June 24. SM 1.1.10 candidates were posted June 15/16 on the FTP side, so it's coming...
As for the new vulnerability, if it's a Core bug in trunk and branch (not enough information given there), SeaMonkey would be affected as well. Looks like a "firedrill release" again to fix this, in which case 1.1.10 may be delayed if that fix comes quick enough. This happened before, which is one reason that SM is a few minor-version numbers behind FF/TB.
June 21st, 2008, 7:32 am
Just an update on this: According to the IRC logs, a second release candidate containing a fix for the security bug should appear shortly. Also, Firefox 2.0.0.15 release is pushed to July 1 now, a respin for the same reason I assume.
June 22nd, 2008, 2:20 pm
Thanks for the update. July 1 looks like a plan and a way to properly incorporate the bug fix. N
XP PRO SP3, Comodo3, Anti-Vir Free, MalwareBytes, Panda Anti-RootKit
June 22nd, 2008, 2:31 pm
You are welcome. The updated SeaMonkey 1.1.10 builds are already in the nightly folder, don't see anything for Firefox yet. This would have been much easier if that so-called "anonymous researcher" had simply filed a bug report during the FF3 beta phase rather than holding back and cashing in for this in a publicity stunt...
June 24th, 2008, 5:14 am
What...???
Going from 1.1.9 to 1.1.10... That doesn't make sense. Isn't the next number 1.2.0 ???
June 24th, 2008, 6:17 am
Why not? It's a minor upgrade, just as Firefox goes from 2.0.0.14 to 2.0.0.15 in that branch.
No, never was. SM 1.1.x is based on the same 1.8.1 branch as FF/TB 2.0. There have been 1.5 pre-alphas some time ago, then the numbering was moved to 2.0, and this will be the next major release (likely based on the 1.9.1 branch, thus on the level what Firefox 3.1 would be).
June 24th, 2008, 9:09 am
Instead of looking at it as 1.1.9, think of it as, 001.001.009.
Then the next update would be, 001.001.010. Ten being greater then nine. It is typically only when going from an x9 to a .x0 revision that the numbering seems strange. PS: after 1.1.10 will be 1.1.11 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4) Gecko/20091017 SeaMonkey/2.0 Pinball Refspoof CopyURL+ FetchTextURL FlashGot NoScript
BANK OF AMERICA.COM ONLINE BANKING SUCKS IN THE HUGEST WAY IMAGINABLE
June 24th, 2008, 9:25 am
Ok, I may have misunderstood Rickkins' question then - thanks therube.
45 posts Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests |
|