WaterFox vs FireFox
- CaJazzman
- Posts: 370
- Joined: March 5th, 2009, 2:21 pm
- Location: Vacaville,California
WaterFox vs FireFox
So, the day before yesterday, I found the WaterFox version browser, and now I have everything I had before such as addons, back up and working so far so good. I will wait until I see something, such as an update and see if it stays like it is now. But, so far, I like what I see and how it runs. Just wanted to see if there are more peeps, that have found WaterFox, and have installed it and there reviews of it?
- mightyglydd
- Posts: 9813
- Joined: November 4th, 2006, 7:07 pm
- Location: Hollywood Ca.
-
- Posts: 792
- Joined: June 24th, 2009, 1:07 pm
Re: WaterFox vs FireFox
regarding Waterfox, the G4.0 version requires an Intel/AMD processor with SSE4.2 support:
https://www.waterfox.net/docs/releases/G4.0.0.1/
then the G4.1.0 version of Waterfox later came out which slightly reduced the minimum CPU requirement to SSE4.1:
https://www.waterfox.net/docs/releases/G4.1.0/
https://www.waterfox.net/docs/releases/G4.0.0.1/
then the G4.1.0 version of Waterfox later came out which slightly reduced the minimum CPU requirement to SSE4.1:
https://www.waterfox.net/docs/releases/G4.1.0/
- DanRaisch
- Moderator
- Posts: 127764
- Joined: September 23rd, 2004, 8:57 pm
- Location: Somewhere on the right coast
Re: WaterFox vs FireFox
Thaks but this thread died six years ago.
Locking due to age.
Locking due to age.
Somewhere on the right coast.